Saṃyutta Nikāya · Discourse 2.20

With Anāthapiṇḍika

Anāthapiṇḍikasutta

Setting
Near Sāvatthī, in Jeta’s Grove, late at night, with a following-morning report to the mendicants
Speakers
An unnamed godling, later identified; the Buddha; and Venerable Ānanda
Form
Three verses of praise, an elided verbatim repeat, and a closing dialogue confirming the speaker's identity
Length
~3 minutes to read
Northern parallel
A rough counterpart may exist in the Chinese Saṃyukta-āgama (T99), though this reading guide does not assert a specific matching sutra number
Difficulty
★★★★☆ — the longest and most narratively developed discourse in this vagga

Why this discourse

This discourse closes the Anāthapiṇḍikavagga with its most personal moment yet: an unnamed godling recites verses praising Jeta’s Grove, the deeds and conduct that purify a person, and Venerable Sāriputta by name, before vanishing. The next morning, after the Buddha reports the visit (its repetition elided, following this book's established convention), Venerable Ānanda deduces the godling's identity from a single clue — devotion to Sāriputta — and the Buddha confirms it: the godling was Anāthapiṇḍika himself, the great lay patron who donated Jeta’s Grove, now returning to the monastery he built after his own death and rebirth as a godling.

Reading guide

Unnamed at first, deliberately

The godling is introduced only as ‘a certain glorious godling’, withholding the name this discourse's title already gives away — a structure that only works fully on a first, title-blind reading, but still shapes how the verses themselves build toward their own identifying clue.

This is indeed that Jeta's Grove

The opening verse names the setting with proprietary warmth — ‘this is indeed that Jeta’s Grove… it brings me joy!’ — the possessive tone of someone returning to a place they themselves once gave, though nothing in the verse yet says so directly.

Purified by deeds, not by clan or wealth

The second verse's claim — that mortals are purified by deeds, knowledge, principle, ethical conduct, and livelihood, ‘not by clan or wealth’ — carries particular weight from a speaker who, in life, was one of the wealthiest lay supporters of the entire monastic community, insisting that wealth was never the actual basis of his own standing.

A closing tribute to Sāriputta, by name

The third verse turns from general teaching to a specific person, praising Venerable Sāriputta's wisdom, ethics, and peace as something ‘even a mendicant who has crossed over might at best equal’ — and it is precisely this detail, not the grove or the teaching, that lets Ānanda solve the riddle of who the godling was.

Ānanda's deduction, and the Buddha's precise confirmation

Ānanda reasons from a single biographical fact — that the householder Anāthapiṇḍika was devoted to Sāriputta — to the godling's identity, and the Buddha's reply, ‘you’ve reached the logical conclusion, as far as logic goes’, praises the reasoning itself as sound while confirming its conclusion, a small but distinctive way of endorsing an inference rather than simply supplying an answer.

Key terms

Anāthapiṇḍika — “Anāthapiṇḍika” — the great lay patron who donated Jeta’s Grove for the Buddha's use, here revealed as the unnamed godling of this discourse's opening.
Jetavana — “Jeta’s Grove” — the monastery this discourse's opening verse names with evident personal attachment.
na jaccā na dhanena — “not by clan or wealth” — the second verse's claim about what does not purify a person, spoken notably by one of the community's wealthiest patrons.
Sāriputta — “Sāriputta” — the disciple praised by name in the third verse, and the detail that lets Ānanda identify the speaker.
yāvatakaṁ ñāyaṁ nibbedhikaṁ — “as far as logic goes” — the Buddha's exact phrase confirming Ānanda's inference as sound reasoning, not merely a correct guess.

The text

The discourse in full, with the Buddha's elided verbatim repeat of the godling's verses skipped over as blank in the source and not quoted a second time here, along with the closing uddāna, also left blank in the source. Translation: Bhikkhu Sujato (CC0, SuttaCentral).

§1Standing to one side, the godling Anāthapiṇḍika recited these verses in the Buddha’s presence:

§2“This is indeed that Jeta’s Grove, frequented by the Saṅgha of seers, where the King of Dhamma stayed: it brings me joy!

§3Deeds, knowledge, and principle; ethical conduct, an excellent livelihood; by these are mortals purified, not by clan or wealth.

§4That’s why an astute person, seeing what’s good for themselves, would examine the teaching rationally, and thus be purified in it.

§5Sāriputta is full of wisdom, ethics, and peace. Even a mendicant who has crossed over might at best equal him.”

§6This is what the godling Anāthapiṇḍika said. Then he bowed and respectfully circled the Buddha, keeping him on his right side, before vanishing right there.

§7Then, when the night had passed, the Buddha addressed the mendicants: “Mendicants, tonight, a certain glorious godling, lighting up the entire Jeta’s Grove, came to me, bowed, stood to one side, and recited these verses in my presence.” The Buddha then repeated the verses in full.

§8When he said this, Venerable Ānanda said to the Buddha, “Sir, that godling must surely have been Anāthapiṇḍika. For the householder Anāthapiṇḍika was devoted to Venerable Sāriputta.” “Good, good, Ānanda. You’ve reached the logical conclusion, as far as logic goes. For that was indeed the godling Anāthapiṇḍika.”

· · ·

Self-check quiz

Ten questions. Click an answer to see immediate feedback. No score is recorded — this is for your own checking.

Question 1 of 10
How is the godling first introduced in this discourse?
Correct: A. Withholding the name this discourse's title already gives away.
Question 2 of 10
What does the opening verse say about Jeta's Grove?
Correct: A. Spoken with a proprietary warmth that hints at the speaker's identity before it is confirmed.
Question 3 of 10
What does the second verse claim purifies a person?
Correct: A. A claim carrying particular weight from one of the community's wealthiest patrons in life.
Question 4 of 10
Who does the third verse single out for praise by name?
Correct: A. The detail that ultimately lets Ānanda identify the speaker's true identity.
Question 5 of 10
How does this discourse handle the Buddha's retelling of the verses to the mendicants?
Correct: A. Following the same convention already used at SN 2.8 for a verbatim repeat.
Question 6 of 10
What single clue does Ānanda use to deduce the godling's identity?
Correct: A. A single biographical fact connects the verses' praise of Sāriputta to Anāthapiṇḍika specifically.
Question 7 of 10
How does the Buddha respond to Ānanda's deduction?
Correct: A. A distinctive endorsement of the inference itself, not merely a supplied answer.
Question 8 of 10
Who was Anāthapiṇḍika in life, before his rebirth as a godling?
Correct: A. The discourse's central revelation, explaining the opening verse's proprietary tone toward the grove.
Question 9 of 10
What vagga does this discourse close?
Correct: A. Named for this discourse, its closing one, following the same pattern as this book's first vagga naming.
Question 10 of 10
What is left untranslated at the very end of this discourse in the source?
Correct: A. Blank in the source, consistent with how such closings are handled elsewhere in this collection.
Answered 0 of 10 · Correct 0