Saṃyutta Nikāya · Discourse 35.162

With Koṭṭhita on Impermanence

Koṭṭhikaaniccasutta — Nandikkhayavagga

Setting
Not restated in this discourse
Speakers
Venerable Mahākoṭṭhita, questioning the Buddha directly
Form
A request for brief teaching, then the “give up desire for what is X” formula run across all six sense fields, each expanded fivefold
Length
~2 minutes to read
Northern parallel
A rough counterpart may exist in the Chinese Saṃyukta-āgama (T99), though this reading guide does not assert a specific matching sutra number
Difficulty
★★☆☆☆ — opens a new named dialogue within the vagga

Why this discourse

This discourse opens a three-discourse Koṭṭhika cluster with the familiar “teach me Dhamma in brief, so I can live alone, withdrawn, diligent, keen, and resolute” request — a formula this project has already met repeatedly, most recently at SN 35.86, 88, and 89 in Channavagga. The Buddha's reply gives the “give up desire for what is impermanent” formula, run for the eye and its four companions (sights, eye consciousness, eye contact, and eye-born feeling), then compressed across the remaining sense fields. This same core formula already closed a four-discourse cluster in Book III at SN 22.66, there applied to the five aggregates through a different narrative frame.

Reading guide

A familiar request, a named questioner

“Sir, may the Buddha please teach me Dhamma in brief. When I've heard it, I'll live alone, withdrawn, diligent, keen, and resolute” is the request already met at SN 35.86, 88, and 89 — but this time the questioner is named: Venerable Mahākoṭṭhita, opening the vagga's own three-discourse cluster bearing his name.

The same formula, a different frame from SN 22.66

“Give up desire for what is impermanent” is the identical core instruction SN 22.66 already used for the five aggregates — but there the frame was an unnamed mendicant confirming the teaching back to the Buddha, part of a four-discourse cluster (SN 22.66-69) also covering suffering, not-self, and “not belonging to self.” Here the frame is Mahākoṭṭhita's direct request-and-answer, and the cluster covers only three terms — impermanence, suffering, and not-self — without the fourth.

A fuller expansion than SN 22.66's own

Because the six sense fields each carry an object, a consciousness, a contact, and a contact-born feeling in addition to the field itself, this discourse's own expansion for the eye alone (five terms) is fuller than SN 22.66's single term per aggregate — a structural consequence of the two schemes' different shapes, not a difference in teaching.

Key terms

eko vūpakaṭṭho appamatto ātāpī pahitatto vihareyyaṁ — “live alone, withdrawn, diligent, keen, and resolute” — Mahākoṭṭhita's own stated purpose for requesting this brief teaching, a formula already met at SN 35.86, 88, and 89
yaṁ aniccaṁ tatra te chando pahātabbo — “you should give up desire for what is impermanent” — this discourse's own core instruction, identical to SN 22.66's, there applied to the five aggregates
cakkhu, rūpā, cakkhuviññāṇaṁ, cakkhusamphasso — the eye, sights, eye consciousness, and eye contact — the first four of the five terms expanded for each sense field in turn
mahākoṭṭhika — Mahākoṭṭhita, this discourse's own questioner, opening a three-discourse cluster bearing his name (impermanence, suffering, not-self)
vedayitaṁ sukhaṁ vā dukkhaṁ vā adukkhamasukhaṁ vā — the pleasant, painful, or neutral feeling — the fifth term in each field's own expansion

The text

The complete discourse: Mahākoṭṭhita's request, then the Buddha's reply, run in full for the eye and compressed across the remaining five sense fields. Translation: Bhikkhu Sujato (CC0, SuttaCentral).

§1Then Venerable Mahākoṭṭhita went up to the Buddha … and asked him, “Sir, may the Buddha please teach me Dhamma in brief. When I’ve heard it, I’ll live alone, withdrawn, diligent, keen, and resolute.”

§2“Koṭṭhita, you should give up desire for what is impermanent. And what is impermanent? The eye, sights, eye consciousness, and eye contact are impermanent: you should give up desire for them. The pleasant, painful, or neutral feeling that arises dependent on eye contact is also impermanent: you should give up desire for it. The ear … nose … tongue … body … The mind, ideas, mind consciousness, and mind contact are impermanent: you should give up desire for them. The pleasant, painful, or neutral feeling that arises dependent on mind contact is also impermanent: you should give up desire for it. Koṭṭhita, you should give up desire for what is impermanent.”

· · ·

Self-check quiz

5 questions. Click an answer to see immediate feedback. No score is recorded — this is for your own checking.

Question 1 of 5
What does Mahākoṭṭhita request, opening this discourse?
Correct: A. A request formula already met at SN 35.86, 88, and 89 in Channavagga.
Question 2 of 5
What core instruction does the Buddha give in reply?
Correct: A. "Yaṁ aniccaṁ tatra te chando pahātabbo" — identical to SN 22.66's own formula.
Question 3 of 5
Where has this project already published this identical "give up desire for X" formula, before this discourse applies it to the six sense fields?
Correct: A. SN 22.66 opened a four-discourse cluster with the same core instruction.
Question 4 of 5
How does this discourse's own narrative frame differ from SN 22.66's?
Correct: A. Mahākoṭṭhita's request-and-answer frame contrasts with SN 22.66's request-and-confirm-back structure.
Question 5 of 5
How many terms does this discourse expand for the eye alone, and why more than SN 22.66's single term per aggregate?
Correct: A. Each sense field carries an object, a consciousness, a contact, and a feeling in addition to the field itself.
Answered 0 of 5 · Correct 0