Reading guide
One term substituted, the rest unchanged
Mahākoṭṭhita's own request repeats verbatim; only the characterization changes, from “impermanent” to “suffering” (dukkha), applied to the same six sense fields with the same fivefold expansion for each.
The identical move SN 22.67 already made
SN 22.67 substituted “suffering” for “impermanent” on SN 22.66's own formula, there for the five aggregates. This discourse makes the same substitution on this vagga's own Koṭṭhika formula — the three-marks pattern (impermanence, suffering, not-self) recurring in both clusters, though SN 22.66-69 extends to a fourth term this cluster does not use.
The cluster's middle discourse
This discourse sits between SN 35.162 (impermanence) and SN 35.164 (not-self), completing two of the three marks this small cluster runs through in turn.
Key terms
The text
§1Then Venerable Mahākoṭṭhita … said to the Buddha: “Sir, may the Buddha please teach me Dhamma in brief. When I’ve heard it, I’ll live alone, withdrawn, diligent, keen, and resolute.” “Koṭṭhita, you should give up desire for what is suffering. And what is suffering? The eye, sights, eye consciousness, and eye contact are suffering: you should give up desire for them. The pleasant, painful, or neutral feeling that arises dependent on eye contact is also suffering; you should give up desire for it. The ear … nose … tongue … body … The mind, ideas, mind consciousness, and mind contact are suffering: you should give up desire for them. The pleasant, painful, or neutral feeling that arises dependent on mind contact is also suffering: you should give up desire for it. Koṭṭhita, you should give up desire for what is suffering.”
Self-check quiz
5 questions. Click an answer to see immediate feedback. No score is recorded — this is for your own checking.