Saṃyutta Nikāya · Discourse 4.14

Appropriate

Patirūpasutta

Setting
In Kosalan territory, near the brahmin village of Ekasālā, before a large lay assembly
Speakers
The Buddha, teaching laypeople, and Māra the Wicked
Form
Māra's calculation revealed, a challenge to the Buddha's role, and a reply naming its true motive
Length
~1 minute to read
Northern parallel
A rough counterpart may exist in the Chinese Saṃyukta-āgama (T99), though this reading guide does not assert a specific matching sutra number
Difficulty
★★★☆☆ — best read directly against SN 4.12 for a second version of the same underlying tactic

Why this discourse

This discourse repeats SN 4.12's structure — Māra's private calculation revealed, then a challenge to the Buddha's public teaching — aimed this time not at his confidence but at his role itself: it isn't appropriate for you to instruct others, and in doing so, don't get caught up in favoring and opposing. The Buddha's reply names what actually motivates his teaching, compassion for others' welfare, and claims to be already free of the very trap Māra warns him against.

Reading guide

A challenge to legitimacy, not confidence this time

Where SN 4.12's Māra questioned the Buddha's self-assured manner, here he questions something more fundamental: whether teaching others is appropriate for him at all — a challenge to role and standing rather than tone or demeanor.

A warning framed as concern, not open hostility

Māra's second line — don't get caught up in favoring and opposing — reads almost like friendly advice rather than an attack, warning the Buddha against a genuine spiritual pitfall (partiality) even while questioning his right to teach at all.

A reply naming motive before claiming freedom

The Buddha's answer does not simply deny Māra's warning is relevant; it first states the actual reason he teaches — compassion for others' welfare — before claiming he is already liberated from the specific fault Māra warned against.

Favoring and opposing named as the trap, not teaching itself

The exchange implicitly agrees on what the real danger would be: not instruction as such, but partiality within it — Māra warns against falling into it, and the Buddha claims to have already transcended it, rather than denying it as a genuine concern.

A second instance of a repeating pattern, worth comparing

Read against SN 4.12, this discourse shows the ‘Māra calculates, then challenges a public teaching’ pattern applied to a different target — role instead of confidence — demonstrating the pattern's flexibility across this vagga's middle discourses.

Key terms

Ekasālā — “Ekasālā” — the Kosalan brahmin village near which this discourse's lay assembly gathers.
patirūpa — “appropriate” — the quality Māra denies the Buddha's teaching has, giving this discourse its title.
anuddayā — “compassion” — the actual motive the Buddha names for instructing others.
anunaya paṭigha — “favoring and opposing” — the specific fault Māra warns against, and the one the Buddha claims to be free of.
vippalambheyyaṁ — “pull the wool over their eyes” — Māra's own stated plan, repeated from SN 4.12's formula.

The text

The discourse in full: Māra's revealed calculation, his challenge to the Buddha's role, and the reply naming true motive. Translation: Bhikkhu Sujato (CC0, SuttaCentral).

§1At one time the Buddha was staying in the land of the Kosalans near the brahmin village of Ekasālā. Now, at that time the Buddha was teaching Dhamma, surrounded by a large assembly of laypeople.

§2Then Māra thought, “The ascetic Gotama is teaching Dhamma, surrounded by a large assembly of laypeople. Why don’t I go and pull the wool over their eyes?” Then Māra the Wicked went up to the Buddha and addressed him in verse:

§3“It’s not appropriate for you to instruct others. As you engage in this, don’t get caught up in favoring and opposing.”

§4“The Buddha instructs others out of compassion for their welfare. The Realized One is liberated from favoring and opposing.”

§5Then Māra the Wicked, thinking, “The Buddha knows me! The Holy One knows me!” miserable and sad, vanished right there.

· · ·

Self-check quiz

Ten questions. Click an answer to see immediate feedback. No score is recorded — this is for your own checking.

Question 1 of 10
What structural pattern does this discourse repeat from SN 4.12?
Correct: A. Applied here to a different target than SN 4.12's challenge to confidence.
Question 2 of 10
What does Māra's challenge target this time?
Correct: A. A challenge to role and standing rather than tone or demeanor.
Question 3 of 10
How does Māra's second line — “don't get caught up in favoring and opposing” — read?
Correct: A. Framed as concern even while questioning the Buddha's right to teach at all.
Question 4 of 10
What does the Buddha's reply state first, before claiming freedom from the fault?
Correct: A. Naming motive before addressing the specific warning.
Question 5 of 10
Does the exchange treat partiality (favoring and opposing) as a genuine concern?
Correct: A. Māra warns against it, and the Buddha claims to have already transcended it, not denying its relevance.
Question 6 of 10
What does comparing this discourse to SN 4.12 demonstrate?
Correct: A. Role instead of confidence, showing the pattern's range across this vagga's middle discourses.
Question 7 of 10
Where is this discourse set?
Correct: A. A different location from SN 4.12's Sāvatthī setting, though the same underlying pattern.
Question 8 of 10
Who makes up the assembly in this discourse, specifically?
Correct: A. Distinct from SN 4.12's more general 'large assembly.'
Question 9 of 10
How does Māra react at the end of this discourse?
Correct: A. The stock reaction established across this saṃyutta's discourses.
Question 10 of 10
What term describes Māra's stated plan in his private thought?
Correct: A. The same recurring formula used at SN 4.12 for Māra's revealed calculation.
Answered 0 of 10 · Correct 0