Saṃyutta Nikāya · Discourse 48.36

Analysis (1st)

Paṭhamavibhaṅgasutta — Sukhindriyavagga

Setting
Not specified in the source
Speakers
The Buddha, addressing the mendicants directly
Form
A question-and-answer definition for each of the five faculties in turn
Length
1–2 minutes to read
Northern parallel
No individual parallel confirmed by this project's own check
Significance
★★★★☆ — a new discourse type in this vagga, directly confirming this project's own earlier observation about how the five feeling faculties divide

Why this discourse

This discourse introduces a new form to this vagga: rather than a bare list or a defining criterion for a disciple's attainment, it precisely defines each of the five feeling faculties in turn — confirming directly, from this discourse's own text, the physical/mental/neither split this project's own SN 48.31 had only observed from the bare listing.

Reading guide

A new discourse type: precise, faculty-by-faculty definitions

Confirmed by direct reading, this discourse departs from every earlier discourse in this vagga by directly defining each of the five feeling faculties in a question-and-answer form (“And what is the faculty of pleasure? … This is called the faculty of pleasure”), rather than merely naming them or judging a disciple's understanding of them.

The physical/mental/neither split, now confirmed directly

Confirmed by direct reading, this discourse's own definitions validate exactly what this project's own SN 48.31 could only infer from the bare list: sukhindriya and dukkhindriya are defined as pleasant and painful feeling “born from BODILY contact” (kāyasamphassajaṁ); somanassindriya and domanassindriya as pleasant and painful feeling “born from MIND contact” (manosamphassajaṁ); and upekkhindriya as neither pleasant nor painful, whether physical or mental.

Marked "(1st)", signaling an unread continuation

This project's own honest observation: this discourse's own title, “Analysis (1st),” matches the same “paṭhama” marking pattern already met at SN 48.29 and SN 48.34, signaling a paired “(2nd)” discourse to follow. This project will read it fresh rather than assume its own content in advance.

Key terms

Paṭhamavibhaṅgasutta — “the first analysis discourse” — this discourse's own Pāli title, marking a new definitional form for this vagga
kāyasamphassajaṁ sukhaṁ sātaṁ vedayitaṁ — “the enjoyable, pleasant feeling born from bodily contact” — the precise definition of sukhindriya, the pleasure faculty
manosamphassajaṁ sukhaṁ sātaṁ vedayitaṁ — “the enjoyable, pleasant feeling born from mind contact” — the precise definition of somanassindriya, the happiness faculty
nevasātaṁ nāsātaṁ vedayitaṁ — “neither pleasant nor unpleasant feeling” — the precise definition of upekkhindriya, the equanimity faculty, whether physical or mental
Chaṭṭhaṁ — “the sixth” — the closing colophon marker, confirming this as the vagga's sixth discourse, still without a vagga-closing formula

The text

The complete discourse. Translation: Bhikkhu Sujato (CC0, SuttaCentral).

§1“Mendicants, there are these five faculties. What five? The faculties of pleasure, pain, happiness, sadness, and equanimity. And what is the faculty of pleasure? Physical enjoyment, physical pleasure, the enjoyable, pleasant feeling that’s born from physical contact. This is called the faculty of pleasure. And what is the faculty of pain? Physical pain, physical unpleasantness, the painful, unpleasant feeling that’s born from physical contact. This is called the faculty of pain. And what is the faculty of happiness? Mental enjoyment, mental pleasure, the enjoyable, pleasant feeling that’s born from mind contact. This is called the faculty of happiness. And what is the faculty of sadness? Mental pain, mental displeasure, the painful, unpleasant feeling that’s born from mind contact. This is called the faculty of sadness. And what is the faculty of equanimity? Neither pleasant nor unpleasant feeling, whether physical or mental. This is the faculty of equanimity. These are the five faculties.”

· · ·

Self-check quiz

3 questions. Click an answer to see immediate feedback. No score is recorded — this is for your own checking.

Question 1 of 3
How does this discourse's own form differ from the earlier discourses in this vagga?
Correct: A. A new discourse type in this vagga, directly defining each faculty in turn.
Question 2 of 3
What does this discourse's own definition confirm about sukhindriya and somanassindriya?
Correct: A. Confirming directly what this project's own SN 48.31 could only infer from the bare list.
Question 3 of 3
What does this discourse's own title signal, following the same pattern as SN 48.29 and SN 48.34?
Correct: A. Consistent with this project's own established practice of confirming rather than assuming.
Answered 0 of 3 · Correct 0