Saṃyutta Nikāya · Discourse 5.2

With Somā

Somāsutta

Setting
At Sāvatthī, in the Dark Forest, at the root of a tree
Speakers
The nun Somā and Māra the Wicked
Form
An explicitly sexist challenge, met by a two-stanza rebuttal that dismantles its premise entirely
Length
~1.5 minutes to read
Northern parallel
A rough counterpart may exist in the Chinese Saṃyukta-āgama (T99), though this reading guide does not assert a specific matching sutra number
Difficulty
★★★☆☆ — brief, but among the most frequently quoted discourses in the entire canon

Why this discourse

This is one of the most famous discourses in the Bhikkhunīsaṃyutta, and one of the most quoted in the entire Pali canon. Māra tells Somā directly that the sages' attainment is not possible for a woman, whose wisdom he measures at a dismissive ‘two inches’. Rather than arguing that women can equal men in wisdom, Somā's reply dismantles the entire premise: what does womanhood matter when the mind is serene and the Dhamma rightly discerned? Anyone still caught in thinking ‘I am woman’ or ‘I am man’ — or ‘I am’ anything at all — is exactly the kind of person Māra can still reach.

Reading guide

A challenge stated as explicit sexist doctrine

Unlike this saṃyutta's other confrontations, which generally attack fear, grief, or desire, Māra's claim here is a direct assertion about women's capacity as such — not fear-mongering but a stated belief about gendered limitation, requiring a different kind of rebuttal than intimidation does.

A reply that refuses to argue on Māra's own terms

Somā does not respond by insisting women can, in fact, match men's wisdom, which would implicitly accept gender as the relevant category to measure; instead she asks what difference womanhood makes at all when the mind is serene, refusing the comparison Māra's challenge assumes is meaningful.

A stronger claim: gender itself is not the real issue

The verse's second stanza generalizes beyond the immediate exchange: it isn't merely that womanhood doesn't prevent awakening, but that anyone still invested in any self-identification — woman, man, or ‘I am’ in any form — remains within Māra's reach, gender identity treated as one instance of a broader category of vulnerability.

Fit for Māra to address: a precise closing formulation

‘Fit for Māra to address’ is a carefully chosen phrase: it doesn't say such a person will necessarily be defeated by Māra, only that they remain a meaningful target for him at all — Somā's own freedom from self-view is what places her, implicitly, beyond his reach entirely.

A discourse whose fame reflects its argumentative precision

This discourse's frequent citation, noted directly in SuttaCentral's own summary of this saṃyutta, likely owes less to its brevity than to how precisely its rebuttal identifies self-view, rather than gender comparison, as the actual philosophical target — a move applicable to any claim of essential limitation, not only this specific one.

Key terms

dvaṅgulapaññā — “two-inch wisdom” (literally, two-finger-width wisdom) — Māra's dismissive measure of women's capacity, the challenge Somā's reply answers.
itthibhāva — “womanhood” — the category Somā's opening line questions the relevance of, rather than defending against directly.
cittamhi susamāhite — “when the mind is serene” — the actual condition Somā names as what matters, replacing gender as the relevant measure.
itthāhaṁ purisoti vā — “‘I am woman’, or ‘I am man’” — the verse's phrase for gendered self-identification, continued by ‘or ‘I am’ anything at all’ as one instance of a broader category.
taṁ māro vattumarahati — “is fit for Māra to address” — the verse's precise closing claim, naming vulnerability rather than guaranteed defeat.

The text

The discourse in full: Māra's explicit challenge and Somā's two-stanza rebuttal. Translation: Bhikkhu Sujato (CC0, SuttaCentral).

§1At Sāvatthī. Then the nun Somā robed up in the morning and, taking her bowl and robe, entered Sāvatthī for alms. She wandered for alms in Sāvatthī. After the meal, on her return from almsround, she went to the Dark Forest for the day’s meditation, plunged deep into it, and sat at the root of a tree to meditate. Then Māra the Wicked, wanting to make the nun Somā feel fear, terror, and goosebumps, wanting to make her fall away from immersion, went up to her and addressed her in verse:

§2“That state’s very challenging; it’s for the sages to attain. With her two-inch wisdom, it’s not possible for a woman.”

§3Then the nun Somā thought, “Who’s speaking this verse, a human or a non-human?” Then she thought, “This is Māra the Wicked, wanting to make me feel fear, terror, and goosebumps, wanting to make me fall away from immersion!” Then Somā, knowing that this was Māra the Wicked, replied to him in verse:

§4“What difference does womanhood make when the mind is serene, and knowledge is present as you rightly discern the Dhamma. Surely someone who might think: ‘I am woman’, or ‘I am man’, or ‘I am’ anything at all, is fit for Māra to address.”

§5Then Māra the Wicked, thinking, “The nun Somā knows me!” miserable and sad, vanished right there.

· · ·

Self-check quiz

Ten questions. Click an answer to see immediate feedback. No score is recorded — this is for your own checking.

Question 1 of 10
What claim does Māra make in this discourse?
Correct: A. An explicit assertion about women's capacity as such, not fear-mongering.
Question 2 of 10
How does Somā's reply differ from simply insisting women can match men's wisdom?
Correct: A. Not accepting gender as the relevant category to measure in the first place.
Question 3 of 10
What does the verse's second stanza generalize the point to?
Correct: A. Gender identity treated as one instance of a broader category of vulnerability to Māra.
Question 4 of 10
What does “fit for Māra to address” precisely claim?
Correct: A. A carefully chosen phrase naming vulnerability, not certain defeat.
Question 5 of 10
According to the reading guide, what likely explains this discourse's frequent citation?
Correct: A. A move applicable to any claim of essential limitation, not only the specific sexist one it answers.
Question 6 of 10
How does this discourse's challenge differ in kind from most others in this saṃyutta?
Correct: A. Requiring a different kind of rebuttal than intimidation-based tactics.
Question 7 of 10
What is Somā doing when Māra approaches her?
Correct: A. The same circumstance shared with several other discourses in this saṃyutta.
Question 8 of 10
Where is this discourse set?
Correct: A. The same location as SN 5.1 and several other discourses in this saṃyutta.
Question 9 of 10
How does Māra's closing thought in this discourse read?
Correct: A. Following this saṃyutta's own pattern of crediting the specific nun by name.
Question 10 of 10
What condition does Somā name as what actually matters for attainment?
Correct: A. Replacing gender as the relevant measure Māra's challenge assumed.
Answered 0 of 10 · Correct 0