Saṃyutta Nikāya · Discourse 7.22

At Khomadussa

Khomadussasutta

Setting
At Khomadussa, a town of the Sakyans, in a council hall during a light rain
Speakers
The assembled brahmins and householders of Khomadussa, and the Buddha
Form
A collective dismissal, a single defining verse, and a mass conversion
Length
~2.5 minutes to read
Northern parallel
A rough counterpart may exist in the Chinese Saṃyukta-āgama (T99), though this reading guide does not assert a specific matching sutra number
Difficulty
★★★☆☆ — closing both this vagga and Brāhmaṇasaṃyutta as a whole

Why this discourse

This discourse closes Brāhmaṇasaṃyutta with something none of its twenty-one predecessors offered: a collective audience rather than a single brahmin. Approaching a council hall full of brahmins and householders gathered on business, the Buddha is spotted from a distance and immediately dismissed — not engaged, not questioned, simply written off as a ‘shaveling’ and a ‘fake ascetic’ who doesn't understand council etiquette. His response doesn't defend his own presence directly; it redefines the word ‘council’ itself, arguing that no gathering counts as a true council unless good people are present within it, and that speaking against principle disqualifies anyone from that description regardless of status or seating.

Reading guide

A dismissal delivered before any exchange begins

Unlike every other discourse in this vagga, there's no greeting, no question, no approach at all before the insult; the crowd judges and rejects the Buddha purely from a distance, based on appearance alone.

A whole assembly's contempt, not one brahmin's anger

This is the only discourse in the entire saṃyutta where the hostile party is a collective — ‘the brahmins and householders of Khomadussa’ — rather than a single named individual, scaling up the confrontation to match the discourse's role as the saṃyutta's close.

A redefinition of the word at the center of the insult

Rather than defending his own right to approach, the Buddha's verse redefines ‘council’ itself — not a gathering by status or seating arrangement, but one where good people, defined by their speech and conduct, are actually present.

Speech against principle as the true disqualification

The verse doesn't locate goodness in birth, appearance, or standing within the group that dismissed him; it names speaking against principle — dhamma — as precisely what disqualifies someone from being ‘good’, regardless of who is doing the dismissing.

A collective conversion matching the collective confrontation

Where every other discourse in this vagga closes with a single individual's declaration of lay refuge, this one closes with the entire assembly speaking together — ‘may you remember us’, plural — the scale of the ending matching the scale of the opening dismissal, and closing the whole saṃyutta on a note of collective reversal.

Key terms

ke ca muṇḍakā samaṇakā — “who are these shavelings, these fake ascetics” — the crowd's contemptuous dismissal, delivered before any exchange begins.
nesā sabhā yattha na santi santo — “if good people are not present it is no true council” — the verse's central redefinition.
santo na te ye na vadanti dhammaṁ — “those who speak against principle are not good people” — naming the actual disqualifying condition.
rāgañca dosañca pahāya mohaṁ — “having given up greed, hate, and delusion” — the positive definition of who counts as good.
upāsake no bhavaṁ gotamo dhāretu — “may you remember us as lay followers” — the plural, collective conversion closing the entire saṃyutta.

The text

The discourse in full, closing Upāsakavagga and Brāhmaṇasaṃyutta. The final colophon — the only line of the closing uddāna translated into English in the source — is quoted verbatim below, following this site's established convention for saṃyutta-closing lines. Translation: Bhikkhu Sujato (CC0, SuttaCentral).

§1So I have heard. At one time the Buddha was staying in the land of the Sakyans, where they have a town named Khomadussa. Then the Buddha robed up in the morning and, taking his bowl and robe, entered Khomadussa for alms. Now at that time the brahmins and householders of Khomadussa were gathered in the council hall for some business, while a gentle rain drizzled down. Then the Buddha approached that council. The brahmins and householders saw the Buddha coming off in the distance, and said, “Who are these shavelings, these fake ascetics? Don’t they understand the council rules?” Then the Buddha addressed the brahmins and householders of Khomadussa in verse:

§2“If good people are not present it is no true council; and those whose speak against principle are not good people. Having given up greed, hate, and delusion, speakers of principle are good people.”

§3When he had spoken, the brahmins and householders of Khomadussa said to the Buddha, “Excellent, worthy Gotama! Excellent! As if he were righting the overturned, or revealing the hidden, or pointing out the path to the lost, or lighting a lamp in the dark so people with clear eyes can see what’s there, worthy Gotama has made the teaching clear in many ways. We go for refuge to the worthy Gotama, to the teaching, and to the mendicant Saṅgha. From this day forth, may the worthy Gotama remember us as lay followers who have gone for refuge for life.”

§4The Linked Discourses with Brahmins are complete.

· · ·

Self-check quiz

Ten questions. Click an answer to see immediate feedback. No score is recorded — this is for your own checking.

Question 1 of 10
How does the confrontation begin in this discourse?
Correct: A. Judgment delivered from a distance, based on appearance alone.
Question 2 of 10
Who is the hostile party in this discourse, compared to the rest of the vagga?
Correct: A. The only discourse in the saṃyutta with a collective rather than individual antagonist.
Question 3 of 10
What do the brahmins and householders call the Buddha as he approaches?
Correct: A. A contemptuous dismissal delivered before any actual interaction.
Question 4 of 10
How does the Buddha's verse respond to this dismissal?
Correct: A. Redirecting the argument to the meaning of the word itself, not his own status.
Question 5 of 10
What does the verse name as disqualifying someone from being "good"?
Correct: A. A criterion of speech and conduct, not status or seating.
Question 6 of 10
What does the verse name as the positive definition of "good people"?
Correct: A. Rāgañca dosañca pahāya mohaṁ — an achievable, conduct-based standard.
Question 7 of 10
How does this discourse's closing conversion differ from earlier discourses in this vagga?
Correct: A. The scale of the ending matches the scale of the opening collective dismissal.
Question 8 of 10
What does the discourse's closing colophon say, quoted verbatim in the text section?
Correct: A. The only line of the closing uddāna translated into English in the source.
Question 9 of 10
Where does this discourse take place?
Correct: A. A new setting distinct from the rest of this vagga's Sāvatthī-based discourses.
Question 10 of 10
What does this discourse close, according to its position in the collection?
Correct: A. The final discourse of the saṃyutta's second and last vagga.
Answered 0 of 10 · Correct 0