Saṃyutta Nikāya · Discourse 9.3

With Kassapagotta

Kassapagottasutta

Setting
A forest grove in the Kosalan lands
Speakers
A forest deity and Venerable Kassapagotta
Form
An observed, apparently futile teaching attempt, commented on bluntly in verse
Length
~2.5 minutes to read
Northern parallel
A rough counterpart may exist in the Chinese Saṃyukta-āgama (T99), though this reading guide does not assert a specific matching sutra number
Difficulty
★★★☆☆ — a blunt, unsentimental commentary worth reading without over-endorsing its judgment

Why this discourse

This discourse names its monk, Kassapagotta, but not the person he's actually trying to help: a ‘nimrod’, a rough hunter wandering the rugged hills, whom Kassapagotta attempts to advise during his day's meditation. The forest deity's response is strikingly blunt, calling the effort a waste of time and the hunter unintelligent and unthinking, someone who listens without understanding and looks without seeing. The verse's closing image is deliberately extreme: even ten lit lamps brought before him wouldn't help, because ‘he has no eyes to see.’ This reading guide presents the deity's judgment as stated in the text, without either endorsing it as timeless wisdom about human worth or softening its genuine harshness.

Reading guide

A named monk, an unnamed and dismissed hunter

The discourse gives Kassapagotta his own name while the person he's trying to teach receives only a generic, somewhat contemptuous label — a narrative asymmetry worth noticing, since it shapes whose perspective the verse ultimately centers.

A judgment delivered with no attempt at gentleness

The deity doesn't soften its assessment or hedge with qualification; ‘unintelligent, unthinking’ and ‘he strikes me as an idiot’ are stated plainly, a bluntness this reading guide notes rather than dresses up as measured wisdom.

A description of imperviousness, not simple ignorance

The second stanza doesn't describe someone who merely hasn't yet learned; it describes someone who ‘listens without understanding, looks without seeing’ even while the teaching is actively being spoken — a structural incapacity, not a temporary gap.

A hyperbolic image testing the limits of the claim

Ten lit lamps is a deliberately excessive image; the verse isn't claiming ordinary teaching would be merely difficult, but that no conceivable amount of illumination could help, because the capacity to see is itself said to be entirely absent.

A response left without further comment or defense

The discourse doesn't record Kassapagotta objecting, explaining his effort, or defending the hunter; it simply notes that he was struck with urgency, leaving open exactly what lesson he personally drew from the encounter.

Key terms

chetaṁ ovadati — “tried to advise a nimrod” — Kassapagotta's own effort, described neutrally before the deity's blunt commentary.
giriduggacaraṁ chetaṁ, appapaññaṁ acetasaṁ — “a nimrod wandering the rugged hills is unintelligent, unthinking” — the deity's opening, unsoftened assessment.
suṇāti na vijānāti, āloketi na passati — “he listens without understanding, looks without seeing” — describing a structural incapacity, not mere temporary ignorance.
sacepi dasa pajjote…neva dakkhati rūpāni — “even if you lit ten lamps…he wouldn't see anything” — the verse's deliberately hyperbolic image.
cakkhu hissa na vijjati — “he has no eyes to see” — the closing metaphor for an entirely absent capacity for insight.

The text

The discourse in full. Translation: Bhikkhu Sujato (CC0, SuttaCentral).

§1At one time Venerable Kassapagotta was staying in the land of the Kosalans in a certain forest grove. Now at that time Venerable Kassapagotta, having withdrawn for his day’s meditation, tried to advise a nimrod. Then the deity haunting that forest approached Kassapagotta wanting to stir him up, and recited these verses:

§2“A nimrod wandering the rugged hills is unintelligent, unthinking. It’s a waste of time to advise him, mendicant; he strikes me as an idiot.

§3He listens without understanding, looks without seeing. Though the teaching is spoken, the fool doesn’t get it.

§4Even if you lit ten lamps and brought them to him, Kassapa, he wouldn’t see anything, for he has no eyes to see.”

§5Impelled by that deity, Venerable Kassapagotta was struck with a sense of urgency.

· · ·

Self-check quiz

Ten questions. Click an answer to see immediate feedback. No score is recorded — this is for your own checking.

Question 1 of 10
What is Kassapagotta attempting to do at the start of this discourse?
Correct: A. An apparently individual, low-key teaching effort.
Question 2 of 10
How does the discourse's treatment of names create an asymmetry?
Correct: A. Shaping whose perspective the verse ultimately centers.
Question 3 of 10
How does the deity describe the hunter?
Correct: A. A bluntness this reading guide notes rather than dresses up as measured wisdom.
Question 4 of 10
What does the verse claim about the hunter's ability to understand the teaching?
Correct: A. Describing a structural incapacity, not a temporary gap in knowledge.
Question 5 of 10
What hyperbolic image does the verse use to emphasize its point?
Correct: A. Testing the limits of the claim through deliberate excess.
Question 6 of 10
What does the closing line "he has no eyes to see" refer to?
Correct: A. A metaphor for entirely absent capacity, not a physical description.
Question 7 of 10
How does this reading guide characterize its own treatment of the deity's judgment?
Correct: A. Neither dressing up the harshness nor dismissing what the text actually says.
Question 8 of 10
How does Kassapagotta respond to the deity's verses?
Correct: A. The discourse leaves open exactly what lesson he personally drew.
Question 9 of 10
Where does this discourse take place?
Correct: A. The same general setting as SN 9.1 and SN 9.2.
Question 10 of 10
What is Kassapagotta doing when the deity approaches him?
Correct: A. The immediate aftermath of the apparently futile teaching attempt.
Answered 0 of 10 · Correct 0