Ten More Minor Precepts
This chapter covers minor precepts 21 through 30 — beginning with the renunciation of revenge, moving through community conduct and right livelihood, and closing with a warning against using philosophical sophistication as cover for actual misconduct.
1. Milestone: Minor Precept 21 — Renouncing Revenge
佛言:「佛子!不得以嗔報嗔,以打報打。若殺父母兄弟六親,不得加報。若國主為他人殺者,亦不得加報。殺生報生,不順孝道。尚不畜奴婢,打拍罵辱,日日起三業,口罪無量,況故作七逆之罪。而出家菩薩,無慈報仇,乃至六親中故報者,犯輕垢罪。」
The Buddha said: "Disciples of the Buddha — you should not repay anger with anger, or a blow with a blow. Even if your own parents, siblings, or close relatives are killed, you should not seek revenge. Even if a ruler is killed by another, you should not seek revenge on their behalf. To answer killing with killing goes against the very way of filial devotion. A bodhisattva should not even keep servants who strike and revile others, for this alone gives rise daily to boundless offenses of speech through the three kinds of action — how much more so the deliberate commission of one of the seven heinous acts. A renunciant bodhisattva who, lacking compassion, seeks revenge — even against harm done within their own family — this is a light offense."
This extends Chapter 8's ninth grave precept — holding onto anger even after an apology — to its hardest test case: the murder of one's own parents. It also extends Chapter 9's precept against storing weapons one step further, from the material means of retaliation to the will to use them at all, even when the provocation is the gravest imaginable.
2. Milestone: Minor Precept 22 — Judging a Teacher by Merit, Not Birth
「若佛子!初始出家,未有所解,而自恃聰明有智,或恃高貴年宿,或恃大姓高門,大解大福,饒財七寶,以此憍慢,而不咨受先學法師經律。其法師者,或小姓年少,卑門貧窮,諸根不具,而實有德,一切經律盡解。而新學菩薩,不得觀法師種姓,而不來咨受法師第一義諦者,犯輕垢罪。」
"Disciples of the Buddha — a bodhisattva newly gone forth, who does not yet understand the teaching, but relies on their own cleverness, or their high birth, or their advanced age, or their prominent family and lineage, or their great learning, wealth, or the seven treasures they possess — and, out of this pride, does not go to learn from a dharma teacher who studied before them — this is wrong. That teacher may be of humble birth, young, of low station, poor, or lacking in physical faculties, and yet genuinely possess virtue, and fully understand the scriptures and discipline. A newly training bodhisattva should not judge a teacher by their lineage, and if they fail to go and learn the ultimate truth from that teacher, this is a light offense."
The precept names, specifically, a teacher of "humble birth... low station... lacking in physical faculties" as someone whose actual understanding must still be sought out — a direct, explicit rejection of judging spiritual authority by social status, written into the precepts themselves rather than left as an implication.
3. Milestone: Minor Precept 23 — Receiving the Precepts Without a Living Teacher
「若佛子!佛滅度後,欲以好心受菩薩戒時,於佛菩薩形像前自誓受戒,當七日佛前懺悔,得見好相便得戒。若不得好相,應二七、三七,乃至一年,要得好相。得好相已,便得佛菩薩形像前受戒。若不得好相,雖佛像前受,戒不得戒。若現前先受菩薩戒法師前受戒時,不須要見好相。何以故?以是法師師師相授故,不須好相,是以法師前受戒即得戒,以生重心故便得戒。若千里內無能授戒師,得佛菩薩形像前受戒,而要見好相。若法師自倚解經律大乘學戒,與國王太子百官以為善友,而新學菩薩來問,若經義律義,輕心惡心慢心,不一一好答問者,犯輕垢罪。」
"Disciples of the Buddha — after the Buddha's final passing, if someone wishes with a sincere mind to receive the bodhisattva precepts, they may vow to receive them for themselves before an image of the Buddha or a bodhisattva. They should confess before that image for seven days, and if they obtain an auspicious sign, they have received the precepts. If they do not obtain such a sign, they should continue for two weeks, three weeks, or even a full year, until an auspicious sign is obtained. Only once the sign is obtained have they truly received the precepts before that image. If no sign is obtained, even though they received the precepts before the image, they have not actually received them. If, however, one receives the precepts directly from a living teacher, no such sign is required — why is this? Because that teacher received the precepts in turn from their own teacher, in unbroken succession, so no sign is needed; receiving the precepts before a living teacher, one receives them at once, through the very seriousness of the intention. If there is no teacher able to confer the precepts within a thousand miles, one may receive them before an image of the Buddha or a bodhisattva, but an auspicious sign is then required. If a dharma teacher, relying on their own understanding of the great vehicle's scriptures and discipline, and their friendship with kings, princes, and officials, is approached by a newly training bodhisattva with a question about the meaning of a sūtra or the discipline, and responds with a careless, unwholesome, or arrogant mind, failing to answer properly, this is a light offense."
The sūtra builds a genuine two-track system here rather than a single rule: receiving the precepts through an unbroken line of living teachers carries its own validating weight and needs no further confirmation; receiving them alone, before an image, asks for independent evidence instead — an auspicious sign — precisely because that second path lacks the first path's chain of accountability.
4. Milestone: Minor Precept 24 — Neglecting the Great Vehicle's Own Teaching
「若佛子!有佛經律大乘正法、正見、正性、正法身,而不能勤學修習,而捨七寶,反學邪見二乘外道俗典、阿毘曇雜論書記,是斷佛性,障道因緣,非行菩薩道。若故作者,犯輕垢罪。」
"Disciples of the Buddha — where the Buddha's own scriptures and discipline, the true dharma, true view, true nature, and true dharma-body of the great vehicle already exist, if you fail to diligently study and practise them, and instead set aside these seven treasures to study the mistaken views of the lesser vehicles, outside paths, secular writings, or scattered Abhidharma commentaries and records, this cuts off buddha-nature and obstructs the path — it is not the practice of the bodhisattva way. If you intentionally do this, this is a light offense."
Where precept 15 in the previous chapter addressed teaching the wrong material to others, this is its mirror: neglecting to study the right material oneself. The sūtra treats correct transmission as a two-sided obligation — what a teacher passes on, and what a student actually takes the trouble to learn.
5. Milestone: Minor Precept 25 — Leading a Community Well
「若佛子!佛滅後,為說法主,為僧房主,教化主,坐禪主,行來主,應生慈心,善和鬥訟,善守三寶物,莫無度用,如自己有。而反亂眾鬥諍,恣心用三寶物者,犯輕垢罪。」
"Disciples of the Buddha — after the Buddha's final passing, one who serves as the leading dharma teacher, the head of a monastery, the head of instruction, the head of meditation practice, or the leader of travel, should give rise to a compassionate mind, skillfully resolving disputes and quarrels, carefully guarding the property of the Three Jewels, never using it without restraint as though it were their own. But if, on the contrary, they throw the community into discord and use the property of the Three Jewels according to their own whim, this is a light offense."
Every leadership role the sūtra names here is functional rather than honorific — teaching, housing, instruction, meditation, travel — and the failure it names is equally concrete: treating shared property as personal property. Leadership, in this precept, is defined by stewardship rather than status.
6. Milestone: Minor Precept 26 — Sharing Hospitality with Visiting Monastics
「若佛子!先在僧房中住,後見客菩薩比丘來入僧房、舍宅、城邑,乃至夏坐安居處,及大會中,先住僧應迎來送去,飲食供養,房舍臥具,繩床,事事給與。若無物,應賣自身及男女,供給所須,悉以與之。若有檀越來請眾僧,客僧有利養分,僧房主應次第差客僧受請,而先住僧獨受請,不差客僧,僧房主得無量罪,畜生無異,非沙門,非釋種姓。若故作者,犯輕垢罪。」
"Disciples of the Buddha — one who resides first in a monastery, on seeing a visiting bodhisattva monk arrive at that monastery, house, or city — even during the summer retreat, or at a great assembly — the resident monastics should welcome them on arrival and see them off on departure, providing food, lodging, bedding, and a proper seat, giving them everything they need. If there is nothing else to give, one should, if necessary, sell one's own body, or one's sons and daughters, to provide for them. If a lay patron comes to invite the assembly of monastics to a meal, and a visiting monastic is entitled to a share of that offering, the head of the monastery should take turns assigning visiting monastics to receive such invitations. But if the resident monastics alone receive the invitation, without including the visiting monastics, the head of the monastery incurs boundless offense — no different from an animal, no true renunciant, no true child of the Buddha. If you intentionally do this, this is a light offense."
The extreme image from the very first minor precept — selling one's own body and children — returns here, now applied to hospitality toward a visiting stranger rather than a senior teacher. The repetition of that image across otherwise very different precepts is its own kind of signal: whatever specific virtue is at stake, the sūtra keeps reaching for the same scale to establish how seriously it should be taken.
7. Milestone: Minor Precept 27 — Keeping Communal Offerings for Oneself
「若佛子!一切不得受別請,利養入己,而此利養屬十方僧,而別受請,即取十方僧物入己。八福田,諸佛聖人,一一師僧、父母、病人物,自己用故,犯輕垢罪。」
"Disciples of the Buddha — you should never accept a private invitation whose offering benefits you alone, when that offering rightfully belongs to the whole community of monastics in every direction. To accept such a private invitation is to take what belongs to the community of the ten directions for oneself alone — property that belongs to the eight fields of merit: the buddhas, the sages, one's own teachers, and the sick — and to use it for oneself is a light offense."
This precept and the one before it are really one concern seen from two directions: precept 26 asks a resident community to share what arrives with visitors; this one asks any individual not to quietly divert a communal offering into a private one. Both treat generosity offered "to the sangha" as belonging to the whole community by default, never to whichever individual happens to receive it first.
8. Milestone: Minor Precept 28 — Inviting Monastics by Turn, Not by Fame
「若佛子!有出家菩薩、在家菩薩,及一切檀越,請僧福田求願之時,應入僧房,問知事人。今欲次第請者,即得十方賢聖僧,而世人別請五百羅漢菩薩僧,不如僧次一凡夫僧。若別請僧者,是外道法,七佛無別請法,不順孝道。若故別請僧者,犯輕垢罪。」
"Disciples of the Buddha — when a renunciant bodhisattva, a lay bodhisattva, or any patron wishes to invite monastics as a field of merit in pursuit of some wish, they should go to the monastery and ask the one responsible for its affairs. To invite monastics in their proper turn is to receive the noble community of the ten directions itself; whereas to single out and invite five hundred famous arhats or bodhisattva-monks by name falls short of simply inviting one ordinary monastic according to their proper turn. To selectively invite monastics by name is the way of outside paths — none of the seven past buddhas ever taught such selective invitation, and it goes against the very way of filial devotion. If you intentionally invite monastics selectively in this way, this is a light offense."
This is one of the more striking claims in the whole chapter: one ordinary monastic invited by proper turn is ranked, explicitly, above five hundred famous arhats hand-selected by name. The precept is not indifferent to merit — it simply refuses to let a donor's own preference for prestige override the community's own order.
9. Milestone: Minor Precept 29 — Wrong Livelihood
「若佛子!以惡心故,為利養故,販賣男女色,自手作食,自磨自舂,占相男女,解夢吉凶,是男是女,咒術工巧,調鷹方法,和合百種毒藥、千種毒藥,蛇毒,生金銀蠱毒,都無慈心。若故作者,犯輕垢罪。」
"Disciples of the Buddha — you should not, out of an unwholesome mind and for the sake of profit, trade in the bodies of men or women, prepare food for sale by your own hand, grind or pound grain for others' hire, practise physiognomy or divination, interpret dreams as fortunate or unfortunate, determine the sex of an unborn child, practise sorcery or crafts of deception, train hawks for hunting, or compound the hundred poisons and the thousand poisons, snake venom, or the toxins of raw metals — all of this done with no compassion at all. If you intentionally do this, this is a light offense."
This precept is this sūtra's own version of "right livelihood," specified the way lists in this genre usually work — not as a positive description of good work, but as a catalogue of specific occupations judged incompatible with a bodhisattva's compassion, from exploitation of people's bodies and superstitions to the manufacture of literal poison.
10. Milestone: Minor Precept 30 — Hypocrisy and False Piety
This group of ten closes with a precept naming a specific and recognizable failure: using the language of emptiness to excuse conduct that plainly contradicts it.
「若佛子!以惡心故,自身謗三寶,詐現親附,口便說空,行在有中,為白衣通致男女交會、婬色縛著,於六齋日、年三長齋月,作殺生、劫盜、破齋犯戒者,犯輕垢罪。如是十戒,應當學敬心奉持,制戒品中廣解。」
"Disciples of the Buddha — you should not, out of an unwholesome mind, slander the Three Jewels yourself while falsely appearing devoted to them, speaking of emptiness with your mouth while acting entangled in attachment; nor should you arrange meetings between men and women for the sake of lustful entanglement on a layperson's behalf, nor commit killing, stealing, or breaking a fast and violating the precepts on the six fasting days or during the three long fasting months of the year. If you do so, this is a light offense. These ten precepts should be studied and upheld with a reverent mind — they are explained fully in the Chapter on Establishing the Precepts."
"Speaking of emptiness with your mouth while acting entangled in attachment" is a precise description of a specific misuse of the very teaching Sessions 1 through 3 of this site's Heart of the Mahāyāna course spent building — treating "nothing is fixed" as license for whatever one wants to do, rather than as a description that was meant to loosen attachment, not excuse indulgence. This closes the third group of ten minor precepts. Precepts 31 through 39 continue in the next chapter.