The Function Mark
This chapter takes up the fourth mark: how buddha-nature functions even in a being who has not yet realized it, giving rise to revulsion from saṃsāra and aspiration toward nirvāṇa. It then asks what has to be in place for this capacity to actually take hold — four conditions likened to the four parts of a wheel — before closing with a careful resolution of two sūtra passages that seem to say opposite things about whether the icchantika can ever be liberated.
Two Functions of the Pure Nature
復次事能相義應知。此清淨性,事能有二:一於生死苦中能生厭離、二於涅槃欲求樂願。若無清淨之性,如是二事則不得成。故經中說:世尊!若無如來藏,於生死苦無厭離意,亦無欲求樂願之心。故不定聚眾生起此二事為用:一於生死苦,觀於過失為依止處,生不定聚眾生厭離心故。二於涅槃樂,觀於功德為依止處,生不定聚眾生欲、求、樂、願。
欲求願樂是四種心,云何為異?初欲者名信。信有四種:一信有、二信不可思議、三信應可得、四信有無量功德,具是四義故名為欲。二求者,為至得此法,心恒勤求無有退悔,名之為求。三樂者,思擇如不如方便,如方便者謂涅槃、不如方便謂生死。思擇涅槃不求速證、思擇生死不求捨離,故名為樂。四願者,從今發願,窮未來際恒以願攝一切眾生未曾捨離,隨所行道並入菩提願海所攝。以自利故不捨涅槃,為利他故不捨生死,故有二觀:一於生死觀苦過失、二於涅槃觀樂功德。故淨分人由清淨性此觀得成。言淨分者,一福德分、二解脫分、三通達分。
福德分者,宿世善根能感此身,具足諸根為受法器。解脫分者,已下功德種子,能感未來世中解脫果報。通達分者,由聖道故能通達真如。是名淨分。是人由淨分為緣、淨性為因,故成此觀,非無因緣。若不由於此二事成,觀無因緣,如闡提人無涅槃性應得此觀。而一闡提既無此觀,故知定須因緣觀方可現。
Next, the function mark should be understood. This pure nature has two functions: first, giving rise, amid the suffering of saṃsāra, to revulsion; second, giving rise to aspiration and delight toward the bliss of nirvāṇa. Without this pure nature, neither of these two functions could be accomplished. Hence the sūtra says: "World-Honored One! Without the tathāgatagarbha, there would be no revulsion toward the suffering of saṃsāra, nor any mind of aspiration and delight." For this reason, sentient beings of undetermined destiny give rise to these two functions: with respect to the suffering of saṃsāra, taking the perception of its faults as their basis, they give rise to a mind of revulsion; and with respect to the bliss of nirvāṇa, taking the perception of its virtues as their basis, they give rise to wish, seeking, delight, and aspiration.
Wish, seeking, aspiration, and delight are four distinct states of mind — how do they differ? The first, wish, is called faith. Faith is of four kinds: faith that it exists, faith that it is inconceivable, faith that it can be attained, and faith that it possesses immeasurable virtue. Second, seeking: in order to attain this dharma, the mind constantly and diligently seeks it, without ever retreating or regretting. Third, delight: this is the discernment between the skillful and the unskillful means — the skillful means being nirvāṇa, the unskillful means being saṃsāra. To discern nirvāṇa without seeking to realize it too hastily, and to discern saṃsāra without seeking merely to abandon it — this is called delight. Fourth, aspiration: from this moment forward, one makes a vow that, throughout the whole of the future, will constantly gather in all sentient beings without ever once forsaking them, so that whatever path one follows is entirely absorbed into the ocean of the vow for enlightenment. For one's own benefit, one does not abandon nirvāṇa; for the benefit of others, one does not abandon saṃsāra — hence there are two contemplations: contemplating the fault of suffering with respect to saṃsāra, and contemplating the virtue of bliss with respect to nirvāṇa. It is the person belonging to the pure portion who, by means of this pure nature, is able to accomplish this contemplation. "Pure portion" refers to three things: the portion of merit, the portion of liberation, and the portion of penetration.
The portion of merit refers to how wholesome roots from former lives bring about this present body, complete with every faculty, fit to serve as a vessel for the Dharma. The portion of liberation refers to how, having already sown the seed of virtue, one is able to bring about the fruit of liberation in a future life. The portion of penetration refers to how, by means of the noble path, one is able to penetrate suchness. These together are called the pure portion. It is by taking this pure portion as condition and this pure nature as cause that a person accomplishes this contemplation — it is not without cause and condition. If it were accomplished without these two, even the icchantika, who has no nature for nirvāṇa, ought to be able to attain this contemplation. Yet the icchantika, precisely because he lacks it, shows us that it must depend on cause and condition before it can manifest at all.
The Four Wheels
是清淨性,不為客塵之所染污,隨三乘中未起一乘信樂。又復未能親事善知識等,乃至四種聖輪亦未相應。言四輪者,一住如法國土、二依善知識、三調伏自身、四宿植善根。輪有三義:一者未得令得、得令不失;二者能度,從此至彼,從他相續至自相續、從自相續復至於他。三者能載,為能從生死得至涅槃。
一住善處者,即是能修正行善人所住之處。若於中住恒見此人,故得覺意。覺者覺悟,意者善心,因此受持善法等事。故佛說偈言:「無知無善識,惡友損正行,蜘蛛落乳中,是乳轉成毒。」是名應住如法國土。二近善友善友者,有七分。如偈言:能施重可信,能說能忍受,說深為善友,安弟子善處。七分者,一能施,由能施故令他憐愛,愛故尊重,重故可信,可信故能說,由能說故能忍受外難,能忍受故能說深理利於善友。由說深法故,能安善友置於善處。若有能備此七德者,可堪依止為善知識。若總論此七,不出三義:一樂憐愍、二聰明、三堪忍。三義若少一種則非善友。若但憐愍不能聰明,譬如父母雖念子病不能救治。若但聰明無慈愍者,如怨家師不治他疾。若不能堪忍,則自行不足,憐愍、聰明亦不成就故。離雖七種,合不出三。能施、尊重、可信,此三屬憐愍攝。能說及說深理,此二屬聰明攝。能忍屬堪忍攝。安善處並通三種。其聰明者表離愚癡,能堪忍者表異凡夫,三憐愍者表異二乘。唯佛世尊備此三德,故堪為眾生真善知識。三調伏自身心者,如正教行,聞時無散亂心、思時無輕慢心、修時無顛倒心。若不自調伏身心者,善處善友則無所用。四宿植善根者,以為解脫分故修善根。善根者,謂信、戒、聞、捨、智。信者不離三寶正念。戒者為不離善道。聞者自聞令他聞,不令他倒聞、不障他聞。因四聞故,今世得聞及思修等,可為法器,三慧具足。捨者有二:一由昔捨物施他,今則損於貪愛。二由昔捨法施人,今則輕滅無明。由此捨故,貪愛無明並稍輕薄,以是因緣得解脫果。智者是人先世已曾思擇三寶四諦故,於此生得世正見,乃至盡智及無生智。如是之人雖具三輪,若無宿善,今生五根則不具足,便是生於八難等處。故知若無宿世善根,則前三輪無所復用。
總此四義,譬之為輪四。若少一輪則不成,解脫之名無由得立。由此四法和合故能得解脫道者,如輪能運能轉,至解脫時無復此能。如聖王輪備有四物,所謂轂、輞、輻、軸。若無此四,輪則不成。以是義故,若未與四輪相應者,是時厭離生死觀及涅槃功德觀並不得成。
This pure nature, though unstained by adventitious defilement, may still, among the three vehicles, not yet have given rise to faith and delight in the one vehicle; furthermore, one may not yet have come to attend upon good spiritual friends, and so has not yet come into accord with the four noble wheels. As to these four wheels: first, dwelling in a land in accord with the Dharma; second, relying on a good spiritual friend; third, subduing one's own body and mind; fourth, having planted wholesome roots in former lives. "Wheel" carries three senses: causing what has not yet been attained to be attained, and what has been attained not to be lost; being able to convey, from here to there, from another's continuum to one's own and back; and being able to bear one from saṃsāra all the way to nirvāṇa.
As to the first, dwelling in a good place: this refers to the place where good people, able to cultivate correct practice, dwell. If one dwells there and constantly sees such a person, one thereby attains an awakened intention — "awakened" meaning insight, and "intention" meaning a wholesome mind. Hence the Buddha's verse says: "Without knowledge, without a good teacher, an evil friend ruins correct practice — as when a spider falls into milk, and the milk itself turns to poison." This is what is meant by dwelling in a land in accord with the Dharma. As to the second, drawing near a good spiritual friend: a good spiritual friend has seven qualities. As the verse says: "Able to give, weighty, trustworthy, able to teach, able to endure, teaching what is profound, one who is a good friend settles the disciple in a good place." The seven qualities are: able to give, since giving wins others' affection; because loved, respected; because respected, trusted; because trusted, able to teach; because able to teach, able to endure outside criticism; because able to endure, able to teach what is profound, for the benefit of one's friends; and by teaching this profound Dharma, able to settle one's friends in a good place. Whoever possesses all seven is fit to be relied upon as a good spiritual friend. To summarize these seven, they come down to three: love and compassion, intelligence, and forbearance. Lacking even one, one is not a good spiritual friend — compassion without intelligence is like parents who, though they love their sick child, cannot cure the illness; intelligence without loving compassion is like a hostile physician who will not treat another's illness; and without forbearance, one's own practice is deficient, undermining the other two as well. Though the qualities are seven when separated out, together they come down to no more than three: giving, being respected, and being trusted belong to compassion; being able to teach and teaching what is profound belong to intelligence; being able to endure belongs to forbearance; and settling the disciple in a good place draws on all three together. Intelligence shows freedom from ignorance, forbearance shows a difference from the ordinary person, and threefold compassion shows a difference from the two lesser vehicles. Only the World-Honored Buddha possesses all three of these virtues in full, and so is fit to be sentient beings' true good spiritual friend. As to the third, subduing one's own body and mind: this means practicing in accord with the correct teaching — a mind free of distraction while listening, free of disdain while reflecting, and free of inversion while cultivating. If one does not subdue one's own body and mind, a good place and a good friend will be of no use at all. As to the fourth, having planted wholesome roots in former lives: this refers to cultivating wholesome roots for the sake of the portion of liberation. The wholesome roots are faith, discipline, learning, generosity, and wisdom. Faith means never departing from right mindfulness of the Three Jewels; discipline, never departing from the wholesome path; learning, hearing the Dharma oneself and causing others to hear it correctly, becoming a fit vessel for the Dharma complete with the three kinds of wisdom; generosity, of two kinds, giving material things in the past, which now diminishes craving, and giving the Dharma, which now lightens ignorance; and wisdom, meaning that this person, having already reflected upon the Three Jewels and the Four Noble Truths in a former life, attains in this life a worldly right view, extending even to the wisdom of exhaustion and of non-arising. Even a person who possesses these three wheels will, lacking wholesome roots from former lives, be born in this present life without the five faculties complete, and will instead be born into one of the eight adverse conditions. Hence, without wholesome roots from former lives, the preceding three wheels would be of no further use at all.
Taking these four aspects together, they are likened to the four parts of a wheel. Lacking even one, the wheel cannot be complete, and the name "liberation" could never be established. It is by the coming together of these four dharmas that the path of liberation can be attained — like a wheel that is able to convey and to turn; once liberation itself is reached, this function of the wheel is no longer needed. It is like the wheel of a sage-king, complete with four parts — hub, rim, spokes, and axle. Lacking any of these four, the wheel could not be complete. For this reason, so long as one has not yet come into accord with all four wheels, neither the contemplation of revulsion toward saṃsāra nor the contemplation of the virtue of nirvāṇa can be accomplished.
Reconciling Two Sūtras on the Icchantika
故經中說:一闡提人墮邪定聚,有二種身,一本性法身、二隨意身。佛日慧光照此二身,法身者即真如理,隨意身者即從如理起。佛光明為憐愍闡提二身者,一為令法身得生、二為令加行得長修菩提行,故觀得成。復有經說:闡提眾生決無般涅槃性。若爾,二經便自相違。會此二說,一了一不了,故不相違。言有性者是名了說,言無性者是不了說,故佛說:若不信樂大乘名一闡提。欲令捨離一闡提心故,說作闡提時決無解脫。若有眾生有自性清淨永不得解脫者,無有是處。故佛觀一切眾生有自性故,後時決得清淨法身。
故經偈言:「聰明人次第,數數細細修,除滅自身垢,如金師鍊金。」聰明人次第者,明此人有解、不倒修,能如次學。數數者,時無暫捨,恒自研求。細細者,從微至著,如聞思修慧細細而習。除滅自垢者,稍除無明重輕諸惑,令清淨本性永得顯現。故說猶如金師能鍊於金,除諸滓璞金,得淨光明。
Hence the sūtra says: the icchantika, though fallen into the assembly fixed toward wrong destiny, nonetheless possesses two bodies — the fundamental dharmakāya, and the body that arises in accordance with intention. The Buddha's sun-like light of wisdom illuminates both these bodies: the dharmakāya being the principle of suchness itself, and the body arising in accordance with intention arising precisely from this principle. The Buddha's light of wisdom, out of compassion for the icchantika's two bodies, serves two purposes: to let the dharmakāya be brought forth, and to let his practice be sustained and extended in cultivating the path to enlightenment — and it is on this basis that the contemplation is accomplished. There is, further, a sūtra that says: icchantika beings decisively have no nature for final nirvāṇa. If this is so, do these two sūtras not contradict one another? To reconcile them: one is of definitive meaning, and the other of provisional meaning — hence they do not, in fact, contradict one another. To say that buddha-nature exists is the statement of definitive meaning; to say it does not exist is the statement of provisional meaning. Hence the Buddha's teaching that one who does not have faith and delight in the Mahāyāna is called an icchantika is spoken in order to make sentient beings abandon that very state of mind, and so it is said that, while remaining an icchantika, there is decisively no liberation. But that there could be a sentient being possessing an inherently pure nature who could never attain liberation — this has no basis at all. Hence the Buddha, observing that all sentient beings possess this nature, teaches that they will, in time, decisively attain the pure dharmakāya.
Hence the sūtra says in verse: "The wise proceed in due sequence, practicing again and again, ever more finely, removing the defilements from within themselves, as a goldsmith refines gold." "The wise proceed in due sequence" shows that such a person has genuine understanding, practices without inversion, and is able to learn step by step in proper order. "Again and again" means never once setting the practice aside, constantly refining and pursuing it oneself. "Ever more finely" means proceeding from the subtle to the manifest, as one cultivates, ever more finely, the wisdom of hearing, reflecting, and meditating. "Removing the defilements from within themselves" means gradually eliminating the heavier and lighter afflictions of ignorance, so that the inherently pure nature is at last permanently revealed. Hence it is said to be just like a goldsmith able to refine gold, removing all its dross, until the pure gold's own radiance is attained.
This chapter's resolution of the icchantika question is the treatise's clearest statement of its own hermeneutic method: when two sūtra passages conflict, one is read as definitive (了義) and the other as provisional (不了義), spoken for a purpose rather than as bare metaphysical description. Here the "no nature" statement is provisional — a warning aimed at a particular attitude, hatred of the Mahāyāna, not a claim about some beings' permanent metaphysical status — while "all beings possess buddha-nature" is definitive, the settled truth the provisional statement was written to protect. This is the same interpretive move the treatise used back in Fascicle One's opening chapter, and it will recur again before the treatise is through. It is worth noticing what this method is not: it is not simply choosing the more comforting of two readings. The treatise offers a reason — a claim that could not be coherently maintained (a being with no nature for nirvāṇa, existing as a being at all) turns out, on examination, to be self-undermining, exactly as Part 2 argued back in Fascicle One. The provisional reading is provisional because the literal reading fails on its own terms, not because it is unwelcome.
Fascicle Two Complete
This closes Fascicle Two and the treatise's fourth mark, the function mark. Fascicle Three opens with the fifth mark, the mark of total inclusion (總攝相), the treatise's longest single chapter — first exploring how buddha-nature is included within cause, through the simile of the ocean gathering treasure, virtue, and compassion into itself, and then within fruit, through the simile of the sun's own body, light, and brightness corresponding to the three bodies of a buddha.
Continue to Part 13 — Total Inclusion, by Cause →