Vasubandhu (attrib.) · Paramārtha · 佛性論

Treatise on Buddha Nature.

Why does the Buddha teach that every sentient being possesses buddha-nature? The Foxing Lun answers with an argument, not just an assertion — refuting rival schools of Indian philosophy one by one, defining tathāgatagarbha through three distinct senses of the word garbha, and then distinguishing buddha-nature's ten marks in exhaustive detail, from its self-essence to why it can be called by four different names without ever becoming four different things. No Sanskrit or Tibetan version of this text survives — Paramārtha's sixth-century Chinese translation (T1610) is its only witness, and, unusually for a treatise this influential, it never attracted a dedicated commentary of its own. This collection translates the whole of it across twenty-two pages.

How to read this collection

The treatise runs to roughly 37,000 Chinese characters across four fascicles (卷), read here across twenty-two pages — long enough that a single page per fascicle would have buried the argument's own turns. Fascicle One is almost entirely negative: refuting a Hīnayāna misreading, then the Vaiśeṣika and Sāṃkhya schools of Indian philosophy in close, technical detail, then a Mahāyāna misunderstanding of the two truths. Only once this ground is cleared does Fascicle Two state, positively, what buddha-nature is — the three causes, the three natures, and the treatise's most quoted passage, the three meanings of tathāgatagarbha. Fascicles Three and Four then work through buddha-nature's ten distinguishing marks in order, closing with the treatise's own three-part statement of why it was written at all.

Because no ancient commentary on this specific text survives, the reading notes on this collection's pages are original commentary from Ru-Yi Meditation Center rather than a translation of a named master's gloss — and they appear only where a passage seemed to call for one, not on every page.

What each page includes

  • The Chinese source text beside our English translation, checked against the base text for coverage.
  • Original reading notes from Ru-Yi Meditation Center, marked as such, appearing only where warranted.
  • Cross-references tying the treatise's several similes and classification schemes back to one another as they accumulate across pages.
  • Terminology matched to this site's existing Yogācāra and tathāgatagarbha-line pages wherever the same term already has an established rendering.
22 of 22 parts translated — complete
37,000+ Chinese characters of root text translated in full
No surviving ancient commentary — reading notes are original

The Treatise's Own Structure

Four major divisions, spanning four fascicles. The fourth, "distinguishing the marks," is by far the largest — ten marks of buddha-nature, occupying the whole of Fascicles Three and Four.

Fascicle 1 · 緣起分
The Part on Causes and Conditions
A single question — why did the Buddha teach buddha-nature at all? — answered with five faults it removes and five virtues it gives rise to.
Part 1 · complete
Fascicle 1 · 破執分
The Part Refuting Attachments
Three refutations in turn: a Hīnayāna reading that some beings never attain nirvāṇa; the Vaiśeṣika and Sāṃkhya schools' claims that dharmas possess fixed self-nature, met with citations from Nāgārjuna; and a Mahāyāna misreading of the two truths.
Parts 2–6 · complete
Fascicle 2 · 顯體分
The Part Revealing the Essence
The treatise's positive teaching begins: the three causes that make buddhahood possible, the Yogācāra three-natures framework, and the treatise's best-known passage — the three meanings of tathāgatagarbha as that which is enfolded, concealed, and enfolds.
Parts 7–8 · complete
Fascicles 2–4 · 辯相分
The Part Distinguishing the Marks
Ten marks of buddha-nature in order: self-essence (the wish-fulfilling jewel), cause (four causes, four obstructions), fruit (the dharmakāya's four pāramitās), function, total inclusion (the treatise's longest chapter — the ocean, the sun, the seven names of the dharmakāya, and an extended defense of nirvāṇa's permanence), differentiation, stages, pervasion, non-change (nine similes mapped onto the three buddha-bodies, six pairs of extremes and their middle ways, ten reasons for permanence), and non-difference — closing with the treatise's own statement of why it was composed.
Parts 9–22 · complete

Translation Notes

Recurring terms, kept consistent across all twenty-two parts. Where a term already has an established rendering elsewhere on this site's Yogācāra and tathāgatagarbha-line pages, we reuse it. See the full translation notes for the complete glossary, and also this site's note on translation method.

如來藏 — tathāgatagarbhaLeft untranslated, matched to this site's existing Śūraṅgama and Awakening of Faith pages.
轉依 — the transformed basisCoined fresh for this collection; the treatise's own term for the dharmakāya considered as the endpoint of purification.
三性 — the three naturesImagined (分別), dependent (依他), perfected (真實) — matched to this site's existing Yogācāra pages.
常樂我淨 — permanence, bliss, self, purityThe dharmakāya's four pāramitās, matched to this site's existing Śrīmālādevī-citing pages.
法身 / 應身 / 化身 — dharmakāya / sambhogakāya / nirmāṇakāyaKept as Sanskrit loanwords per site convention; 應身 here corresponds to what other pages sometimes call the reward body.
一闡提 — icchantikaKept as the Sanskrit loanword; the treatise's own resolution of whether icchantikas can attain nirvāṇa is a recurring thread from Part 2 through Part 12.