Ten Reasons for Permanence
This page closes the treatise's longest chapter, the mark of non-change, with ten reasons the three bodies are genuinely permanent — from the boundlessness of the causes that produced them to a nature that was never, at any point, first brought into being. It then answers a question a careful reader might well have been holding since Fascicle One: if the standard Mahāyāna teaching says all dharmas are like clouds, dreams, and illusions, how can the treatise also insist that buddha-nature truly exists? The chapter closes by summarizing the nine similes and reducing the six aspects of non-change to three.
Ten Reasons for Permanence
復次此三身者,恒能生起世間利益等事,故說常住。常住者,依十種因緣。十者,一因緣無邊、二眾生界無邊、三大悲無邊、四如意足無邊、五無分別智無邊、六恒在禪定無散、七安樂清涼、八行於世間八法不染、九甘露寂靜遠離死魔、十本性法然無生無滅。
一因緣無邊故常者,無量劫來捨身命財、為攝正法,正法既無邊際無窮無盡,還以無窮之因感無窮果,果即三身,故得是常。二眾生無邊故常者,初發心時結四弘誓、起十無盡大願:若眾生不可盡,我願無盡;眾生若盡,我願乃盡。眾生既其無盡,是故化身常在世間,教導眾生無有窮盡。三大悲無邊故常者,若諸菩薩分有大悲,尚能恒救眾生心無齊限,久住生死不入涅槃,何況如來眾德圓滿,常在大悲,救拔恒恩,豈有邊際?是故言常。四四如意無邊故常者,世間有得四神足者,尚能住壽四十小劫,何況如來為大神足師,而當不能住壽自在億百千劫廣化眾生?是故名常。五無分別慧無邊故常者,遠離生死涅槃二執,一向與第一義諦相應,不動不出,故知是常。
六恒在禪定故常者,世間有人得禪定者,尚能不為水火燼溺刀箭所傷,何況如來常在禪定而應可壞?是故名常。七安樂清涼故常者,安樂即是金剛心,能除無明住地最後念無常苦。以無苦故,故名安樂。佛果顯成,故名清涼。是解脫道,故名為常。八行於世間八法不染故常者,佛身雖復在於道前,生死相應而不為彼煩惱所染,無妄想緣,故是常住。九甘露寂靜遠離死魔故常者,甘露令人長仙不死,金剛之心能除無明最後念惑,故得佛果常樂,常樂故寂靜,寂靜故遠離死魔,離死魔故是常住法。十性無生滅故是常者,法身非本無今有、本有今無,雖行三世,非三世法。何以故?此是本有,非始今有。過三世法,是故名常。
Next, these three bodies, being constantly able to give rise to benefit within the world, are said to be permanently abiding. This permanence rests upon ten causes and conditions: the boundlessness of causes and conditions; the boundlessness of the realm of sentient beings; the boundlessness of great compassion; the boundlessness of the bases of miraculous power; the boundlessness of non-discriminating wisdom; constantly abiding in meditative concentration without distraction; peaceful bliss and coolness; conduct within the world unstained by the eight worldly winds; the deathless, still, being far removed from the demon of death; and its inherent, spontaneous nature being without arising or cessation.
First, permanent because the causes and conditions are boundless: throughout immeasurable eons, the bodhisattva has given up body, life, and wealth for the sake of upholding the true Dharma; and since the true Dharma is itself boundless and inexhaustible, this inexhaustible cause invites an inexhaustible fruit — the three bodies — hence they are permanent. Second, permanent because the realm of sentient beings is boundless: at the moment of first arousing bodhicitta, the bodhisattva binds himself to the four great vows: "If sentient beings cannot be exhausted, my vow shall likewise be inexhaustible." Since sentient beings are inexhaustible, the nirmāṇakāya remains constantly present in the world, teaching without end. Third, permanent because great compassion is boundless: if bodhisattvas, possessing only a portion of great compassion, are already able to constantly rescue sentient beings, remaining long within saṃsāra rather than entering nirvāṇa — how much more so the Tathāgata, whose every virtue is fully complete? Fourth, permanent because the bases of miraculous power are boundless: even a worldly being who has attained these powers can extend his lifespan for forty minor eons — how much more so the Tathāgata, the great master of such power? Fifth, permanent because non-discriminating wisdom is boundless: being far removed from attachment to both saṃsāra and nirvāṇa, and constantly in accord with the ultimate truth alone.
Sixth, permanent because of constantly abiding in meditative concentration: even a worldly person who has attained concentration is already unharmed by burning, drowning, blade, or arrow — how much more so the Tathāgata? Seventh, permanent because of peaceful bliss and coolness: "peaceful bliss" is the vajra-like mind, able to remove the ground of ignorance's very last moment of suffering; the fruit of buddhahood, thus manifested, is called cool — being the path of liberation, it is called permanent. Eighth, permanent because conduct within the world remains unstained by the eight worldly winds: though the Buddha's own body was once conjoined with saṃsāra even prior to the path, it was never stained by that affliction. Ninth, permanent because it is deathless, still, and far removed from the demon of death: the vajra-like mind, removing ignorance's very last moment of delusion, attains the permanent bliss of buddhahood; being permanently blissful, it is still; being still, it is far removed from death. Tenth, permanent because its very nature is without arising or cessation: the dharmakāya is neither something originally absent that now exists, nor something originally existing that is now absent — though it moves through the three times, it is not itself a dharma of the three times, being inherently, originally existent rather than something that only now comes to exist.
Clouds, Dreams, and Buddha-Nature
問曰:佛說大乘諸經,一向皆言顯諸法空如雲夢幻。煩惱能障故,以雲為譬;一切諸業不真實故,以夢為譬;一切五陰果報煩惱業所起故,故以幻為譬。前說此經顯於此義,云何更說一切眾生皆有佛性?答曰:已如初說,五種功德除五過失,明有佛性,是故言有。
Question: "The Buddha, in teaching the various Mahāyāna sūtras, consistently declares that all dharmas are empty, like clouds, dreams, and illusions — since affliction obstructs, the cloud is given as its simile; since every karmic action is unreal, the dream is given as its simile; and since every retribution of the five aggregates arises from affliction and karma, the illusion is given as its simile. Given that these sūtras have already been taught to reveal this very meaning, why does the treatise go on to say that all sentient beings possess buddha-nature?" Answer: "As already explained at the outset, the five virtues remove five faults, and it is precisely in order to demonstrate the existence of buddha-nature that it is said to exist."
Five Meanings of the Nine Similes
復次此九種譬,為顯佛性有五義應知。五義者,一真實有、二依方便則可得見、三得見已功德無窮、四無初不應相應㲉。釋曰:無初者,謂煩惱業報並皆無始,故言無初。不應者,由此三故違逆法身,故言不應。相應者,由依法身得起此三,故說相應。㲉者,此三能藏法身,故名為㲉。五無初相應善性為法者,釋曰:無初者,以性得般若大悲禪定,法身並本有故,故言無初。體用未曾相離,故言相應。是名無初相應。善性為法者,法身自性無改,由般若故;性有威德,由禪定故;性能潤滑,由大悲故,故稱善性為法。
Next, it should be understood that these nine similes reveal five meanings concerning buddha-nature: that it is truly existent; that it can be seen by means of skillful means; that, once seen, its virtue is inexhaustible; and that it is without beginning, and yet is not itself in correspondence with affliction, being merely enveloped by it. Explanation: "without beginning" means that affliction and its karmic retribution are both, alike, without any beginning at all. "Not in correspondence" means that, because of these three afflictions, the dharmakāya is opposed. "Correspondence" means that it is by depending on the dharmakāya that these three arise at all. "Enveloped" means that these three are able to enclose the dharmakāya, hence called "the shell." Fifth, that it is, without beginning, in correspondence, its wholesome nature constituting the dharma. Explanation: "without beginning" means that, by nature, prajñā, great compassion, and meditative concentration, together with the dharmakāya, are all, alike, originally existent. Essence and function having never once been separated, it is said to be "in correspondence." As to "its wholesome nature constituting the dharma": the dharmakāya's own self-nature is unaltered, on account of prajñā; its nature possesses majestic virtue, on account of meditative concentration; and its nature is able to moisten and smooth, on account of great compassion.
The Six Aspects, Explained and Reduced to Three
如是九譬,釋無前後際變異義竟。二無染淨變異者,法身不為生死陰界入等所污,故言無染。非智數所作,故言無淨。三無生變異者,法身無生故非起成,非起成故非是始有,不論變異。四無老變異者,法身無動轉故無所改異,故言無老。五無依住變異者,若法有依有住即有變異,法身不由他故,無依無所的在,故言無住。六無滅變異者,法身常住、不可破壞,故言無滅變異,是名無變異。
六種別義究竟。復次合六為三者,一前後寂靜,謂無前後際異。二無流,即無染淨異。三無為,謂無四相生住滅等故無有變異。是故一切妄想諸法有三變異:一果報盡故變異、二對治所破故變異、三剎那念念滅故變異。法身不爾,離三過失故一;前後寂靜故無果報,盡變異二;無流故無對治,破變異三。非有為法故、無念念壞變異故,名無變異。
These nine similes conclude the explanation of the meaning of no change across former and latter times. Second, no change of defilement and purity: the dharmakāya is never sullied by the aggregates, elements, and sense-fields of saṃsāra, hence undefiled; nor is it fashioned by any wisdom or reckoning, hence without contrived purity. Third, no change of arising: since the dharmakāya has no arising, it never comes into being through any process of arising, and was never something that first came to exist. Fourth, no change of aging: since it undergoes no motion or alteration, it has nothing that changes. Fifth, no change of dependence and abiding: if a dharma has something to depend on and somewhere to abide, change follows — but the dharmakāya depends on nothing else, having no dependence and no fixed location. Sixth, no change of cessation: the dharmakāya is permanently abiding and cannot be destroyed.
This concludes the explanation of the six particular meanings. Next, as to combining these six into three: stillness across former and latter times, that is, no difference across former and latter times; being outflow-free, that is, no difference between defilement and purity; and being unconditioned, that is, being free of the four marks of arising, abiding, and cessation, and hence without change. For this reason, every dharma born of delusive thought undergoes three kinds of change: change on account of the exhaustion of karmic retribution; change on account of being broken by an antidote; and change through perishing moment by moment. The dharmakāya is not like this: being free of these three faults, it is, in the first sense, one and undivided; being still across former and latter times, it is, in the second sense, free of the change of karmic retribution's exhaustion; being outflow-free, it is, in the third sense, free of any antidote that could break it. Not being a conditioned dharma, and free of the change of perishing moment by moment, it is called non-change.
The question this chapter answers near its close — how can buddha-nature truly exist if all dharmas are like clouds, dreams, and illusions? — is really the treatise's whole project stated as a single objection. The answer given is brief almost to the point of terseness: the five virtues removing five faults, from Part 1's opening chapter, already established that it exists. But the entire length of this chapter, its nine similes and ten reasons for permanence, is the real answer, worked out in full rather than merely asserted. Clouds, dreams, and illusions are the right similes for saṃsāric phenomena precisely because those phenomena are conditioned, dependently arisen, exhausted the moment their causes are exhausted — everything this chapter has just spent its whole length showing the dharmakāya is not. The two teachings were never actually in tension; they describe two different things, and the entire mark of non-change has been a sustained argument for why buddha-nature is not one more entry on the list of things that pass like a dream.
The Mark of Non-Change Complete
This closes the treatise's ninth and longest mark — nine similes, three bodies, ten reasons for permanence, and the resolution of Buddhism's own apparent self-contradiction between universal emptiness and a truly existent buddha-nature. Part 22 closes the entire treatise with its tenth and final mark, non-difference: four senses in which buddha-nature admits of no distinction at all, and the treatise's own closing statement of what the whole work has been trying to show.
Continue to Part 22 — Non-Difference, and the Treatise's Close →