Part 7 of the collection · Fascicle 1 of 4 · 楞伽阿跋多羅寶經 T0670

Gradual and Sudden Purification

Mahāmati asks whether the Tathāgata purifies the self-manifesting flow of a sentient being's mind gradually or all at once, and the Buddha answers with six similes — a fruit ripening, a potter's vessel, the earth bringing forth its plants, and a musician's slowly acquired skill for the gradual side; a mirror showing every form at once, and the sun and moon lighting up every color together for the sudden side. The page then turns to a distinction this sūtra will return to often: the dharma-body buddha, apart from every mark of grasping, and the buddhas who depend on that dharma-body to teach — followed by two kinds of śrāvaka a bodhisattva must learn to tell apart, since only one of the two is actually mistaken.

Translator: Ru-Yi Meditation Center Status: Part 7 of 50 complete Source: Taishō T0670, 楞伽阿跋多羅寶經 (tr. Guṇabhadra, 443 CE) Reading notes after Zongle and Ruqi's 楞伽阿跋多羅寶經註解 (T1789)

Six Similes for Purification, and the Dharma-Body Buddha

Chinese Source

爾時大慧菩薩為淨自心現流故,復請如來,白佛言:「世尊!云何淨除一切眾生自心現流?為頓為漸耶?」

佛告大慧:「漸淨非頓。如菴羅果,漸熟非頓;如來淨除一切眾生自心現流,亦復如是,漸淨非頓。譬如陶家造作諸器,漸成非頓;如來淨除一切眾生自心現流,亦復如是,漸淨非頓。譬如大地漸生萬物,非頓生也;如來淨除一切眾生自心現流,亦復如是,漸淨非頓。譬如人學音樂書畫種種伎術,漸成非頓;如來淨除一切眾生自心現流,亦復如是,漸淨非頓。譬如明鏡,頓現一切無相色像;如來淨除一切眾生自心現流,亦復如是,頓現無相、無有所有清淨境界。如日月輪,頓照顯示一切色像;如來為離自心現習氣過患眾生,亦復如是,頓為顯示不思議智最勝境界。譬如藏識,頓分別知自心現及身安立受用境界;彼諸依佛,亦復如是,(依者胡本云津膩,謂化佛是真佛氣分也)。頓熟眾生所處境界,以修行者安處於彼色究竟天。譬如法佛所作依佛,光明照曜。自覺聖趣,亦復如是,彼於法相有性無性惡見妄想,照令除滅。大慧!法依佛,說一切法,入自相共相自心現習氣因,相續妄想自性計著因,種種無實幻,種種計著,不可得。

「復次,大慧!計著緣起自性,生妄想自性相。大慧!如工幻師,依草木瓦石作種種幻,起一切眾生若干形色,起種種妄想。彼諸妄想亦無真實。如是,大慧!依緣起自性,起妄想自性。種種妄想心,種種想行事妄想相,計著習氣妄想。大慧!是為妄想自性相生。大慧!是名依佛說法。大慧!法佛者,離心自性相,自覺聖所緣境界,建立施作。大慧!化佛者,說施、戒、忍、精進、禪定,及心智慧。離陰界入,解脫識相分別。觀察建立,超外道見,無色見。大慧!又法佛者,離攀緣,所緣離,一切所作根量相滅,非諸凡夫、聲聞、緣覺、外道計著我相所著境界,自覺聖究竟差別相建立。是故,大慧!自覺聖差別相,當勤修學,自心現見,應當除滅。

Ru-Yi Translation

Then Mahāmati Bodhisattva, wishing [to understand how] to purify the self-manifesting flow of his own mind, again made a request of the Tathāgata, saying to the Buddha: "World-Honored One, how is the self-manifesting flow of every sentient being's mind purified? Is it all at once, or gradually?"

The Buddha told Mahāmati: "It is purified gradually, not all at once. Just as an āmra fruit ripens gradually, not all at once, so too the Tathāgata purifies the self-manifesting flow of every sentient being's mind — gradually, not all at once. It is like a potter fashioning his vessels: they are formed gradually, not all at once; so too the Tathāgata purifies the self-manifesting flow of every sentient being's mind — gradually, not all at once. It is like the great earth bringing forth its ten thousand things gradually, never all at once; so too the Tathāgata purifies the self-manifesting flow of every sentient being's mind — gradually, not all at once. It is like a person learning music, calligraphy, painting, or any other art or craft: mastery comes gradually, not all at once; so too the Tathāgata purifies the self-manifesting flow of every sentient being's mind — gradually, not all at once. [Now, for what is sudden:] it is like a bright mirror, which manifests every form and image, markless, all at once; so too the Tathāgata purifies the self-manifesting flow of every sentient being's mind — manifesting, all at once, the markless, the domain that has nothing at all, utterly pure. It is like the orb of the sun or moon, which illumines and displays every form all at once; so too, for the sake of sentient beings troubled by the fault of the habituated force of their own mind's manifestation, the Tathāgata all at once displays the finest domain of inconceivable wisdom. It is like the storehouse consciousness, which discerns, all at once, its own mind's manifestation and the domain of the body it establishes for its own use and benefit; so too are the various buddhas who depend [upon the dharma-body] (the word rendered "depend" is, in the Central Asian text, one meaning "moist and rich" — showing that a transformation buddha is a true buddha's own vital essence): they all at once bring to ripeness the very domain in which sentient beings dwell, so that the practitioner comes to abide securely within Akaniṣṭha. It is like the dharma-body buddha's own activity, the buddha that depends upon it shining with its own radiance; the domain of self-realized wisdom is just the same — it shines upon, and thereby extinguishes, the false views and false thought, whether of existence or of non-existence, that beings hold concerning the marks of dharmas. Mahāmati, the buddha who depends [on the dharma-body] teaches every dharma so as to enter into the causal habituated force of one's own mind's manifestation, in both its own mark and its shared mark, and the cause of the attachment bound up with the continuing false thought of own-nature — every kind of unreal illusion, every kind of attachment, is thereby rendered ultimately unattainable.

"Furthermore, Mahāmati, attachment to the own-nature of dependent origination gives rise to the mark of the own-nature of false thought. Mahāmati, it is like a skilled illusionist who, relying on grass, wood, tiles, and stones, produces every kind of illusion, calling forth every manner of form for every kind of being, and thereby gives rise to every kind of false thought — yet none of that false thought has anything true within it. Just so, Mahāmati: in dependence on the own-nature of dependent origination, the own-nature of false thought arises — the manifold mind of false thought, the manifold marks of imagined activity and the false thought bound up with it, the false thought of attachment through habituated force. Mahāmati, this is what is meant by the mark of the arising of the own-nature of false thought. Mahāmati, this is called the teaching of the buddha who depends [on the dharma-body]. Mahāmati, the dharma-body buddha is apart from the mark of mind's own-nature, established and brought into activity as the very domain upon which self-realized noble wisdom depends. Mahāmati, the transformation buddha teaches giving, moral discipline, patience, vigor, and meditative concentration, together with mind and wisdom; he leaves behind the aggregates, elements, and sense-fields, liberation, and the discrimination of the marks of consciousness; through observation he establishes [right understanding], passing beyond the views of the outsiders and the view [that mistakes] the formless [absorption for liberation]. Mahāmati, the dharma-body buddha, moreover, is apart from any object clung to, and apart even from that very apartness; every mark of activity and measurable faculty has ceased within him; he is not the domain any ordinary person, śrāvaka, pratyekabuddha, or outsider clings to as a self, but is established as the ultimate mark distinguishing self-realized wisdom. Therefore, Mahāmati, one should diligently train in the mark distinguishing self-realized wisdom, and should extinguish whatever is seen as one's own mind's manifestation.

Reading note — after Zongle and Ruqi

The commentators divide the six similes cleanly into two sets of four and two, and are explicit that the split is not arbitrary: "佛告大慧下,示漸淨相,文凡四喻... 譬如明鏡下,示頓淨相,亦有四喻" — "from 'the Buddha told Mahāmati' onward, four similes show the gradual mark [of purification]... from 'it is like a bright mirror' onward, [the text] shows the sudden mark, likewise through further similes." [The commentators' own count includes the storehouse-consciousness and dharma-body similes among the "sudden" set, since all describe something manifesting complete and instantaneous, in contrast to the fruit, vessel, earth, and craft, each of which ripens by stages.] On the deliberately paired first sudden simile, they draw out a distinction easy to miss: "初無相色像者,為即明之像,像體本空,以喻法中無相境界本無所有,故云『無有所有』" — "the first, 'markless forms and images,' refers to images that are identical with the mirror's own brightness — the image itself has no substance of its own — illustrating that, within the Dharma, the markless domain has, from the outset, nothing at all within it; hence it says 'has nothing at all.'" The mirror simile is not merely about instantaneous manifestation; it is chosen because a mirror's images have no independent substance either, matching the "nothing at all" the sudden purification itself arrives at.

On the notoriously compressed phrase "依者,胡本云津膩,謂化佛是真佛氣分也" embedded in the sūtra's own text — glossing "the buddha who depends" with a foreign-language gloss meaning "moist and rich" — the commentators do not gloss it further but let it stand as received; it appears to preserve an early Chinese translator's marginal note that survived into the main text itself, one of several places across this fascicle where the transmitted text visibly carries traces of its own translation history. On the closing distinction between the dharma-body buddha and the buddha who depends on it, the commentators are careful that "leaving behind" is stated twice for a reason: "離攀緣則異於凡夫,離攀緣離則異於二乘。蓋二乘雖離前塵,又著於空,佛則不然也" — "being apart from what is clung to distinguishes [the dharma-body buddha] from ordinary people; being apart even from that very apartness distinguishes him from the two vehicles. For although the two vehicles have left behind their former objects of grasping, they then become attached to emptiness itself — the Buddha is not so." A dharma-body buddha's freedom is thus doubled: free of grasping at things, and free as well of grasping at that very freedom.

Two Kinds of Śrāvaka

Chinese Source

「復次,大慧!有二種聲聞乘通分別相,謂:得自覺聖差別相,及性妄想自性計著相。云何得自覺聖差別相聲聞?謂無常、苦、空、無我境界。真諦離欲寂滅,息陰界入自共相,外不壞相如實知,心得寂止。心寂止已,禪定、解脫三昧,道果正受解脫,不離習氣、不思議變易死,得自覺聖樂住聲聞;是名得自覺聖差別相聲聞。大慧!得自覺聖差別樂住菩薩摩訶薩,非滅門樂正受樂,顧愍眾生及本願不作證。大慧!是名聲聞得自覺聖差別相樂。菩薩摩訶薩,於彼得自覺聖差別相樂,不應修學。大慧!云何性妄想自性計著相聲聞?所謂大種:青黃赤白,堅濕煖動,非作生自相共相。先勝善說,見已,於彼起自性妄想。菩薩摩訶薩,於彼應知應捨,隨入法無我想,滅人無我相見,漸次諸地相續建立;是名諸聲聞性妄想自性計著相。」

Ru-Yi Translation

"Furthermore, Mahāmati, there are two kinds of mark shared by way of distinction among the śrāvaka vehicle: the mark of one who has attained the distinguishing mark of self-realized wisdom, and the mark of one attached to the own-nature of false thought concerning [dharmas'] own-nature. What is the śrāvaka who has attained the distinguishing mark of self-realized wisdom? He is one who, [contemplating] the domain of impermanence, suffering, emptiness, and no-self, is, in ultimate truth, apart from desire and utterly still, has quieted the own mark, shared mark, and mark of both together belonging to the aggregates, elements, and sense-fields, and knows, in accordance with reality, that the outer, indestructible mark [of things persists even so] — his mind thereby attains stillness. Once his mind has attained stillness, he attains meditative concentration, liberation, samādhi, the fruit of the path, and the true attainment of liberation; though he is not yet free of habituated force, nor of the inconceivable death of transformation and change, he attains the bliss of dwelling in the self-realized noble state proper to a śrāvaka — this is called the śrāvaka who has attained the distinguishing mark of self-realized wisdom. Mahāmati, a bodhisattva-mahāsattva who has attained this same bliss of dwelling in the distinguishing mark of self-realization does not, unlike this śrāvaka, take the bliss of that cessation and that attainment as his own final resting-place; out of concern for sentient beings, and true to his original vow, he does not [use it to] verify his own realization once and for all. Mahāmati, this is what is called the śrāvaka's own bliss in the distinguishing mark of self-realized wisdom — a bodhisattva-mahāsattva should not train himself to remain within that particular bliss. Mahāmati, what is the śrāvaka attached to the own-nature of false thought concerning [dharmas'] own-nature? It refers to one who, seeing that the great elements — blue, yellow, red, and white; solid, moist, warm, and mobile — arise, not through any act of creation, each with its own mark and its shared mark, exactly as the Most Excellent One has skillfully taught, thereupon gives rise to false thought concerning their own-nature. A bodhisattva-mahāsattva should recognize this fault in such a one, and should leave it behind, entering instead into the mark of the no-self of dharmas, extinguishing the view of the mark of the no-self of persons alone, and thereby establishing his own progress, by stages and in succession, through the [bodhisattva] grounds. This is called the mark of the śrāvaka attached to the own-nature of false thought concerning [dharmas'] own-nature."

Reading note — after Zongle and Ruqi

The commentators are emphatic that these two kinds of śrāvaka are not equally mistaken, and warn against reading the pairing as a simple contrast between "the right kind" and "the wrong kind": "雖同是聲聞,得失永異" — "though both alike are called śrāvakas, what each has attained and what each has lost are, in the end, entirely different." The first kind has genuinely realized something real, even if his realization stops short of the Mahāyāna's own further reach — the commentators note precisely where his limitation lies: "不離習氣等者,所破煩惱有正有習,但能斷正,離分段生死;未能斷習,猶有變易生死" — "as for 'not yet free of habituated force': the affliction to be overcome has both a primary form and a residual habituated trace; he is able to cut off only the primary form, and so leaves behind birth-and-death by discrete increments, but, unable to cut off the residual trace, still remains subject to birth-and-death by transformation and change." This is a real, if partial, attainment — which is precisely why the text takes care to distinguish it from the bodhisattva's own bliss in the same realization, rather than dismissing it outright: a bodhisattva "should not train" in remaining fixed there, but the state itself is not a delusion to be corrected.

The second kind of śrāvaka, by contrast, is genuinely in error, and the commentators locate the error precisely in mistaking a skillfully taught provisional description for a final metaphysical claim: "先勝是佛,謂佛善巧宣說,言執教聲聞不能了達自性本空,見彼境界諸相,起自性妄想" — "'the Most Excellent One' here is the Buddha himself — meaning that although the Buddha has skillfully taught [the four elements' natures for pedagogical purposes], a śrāvaka who clings to that very teaching, unable to penetrate to the fact that own-nature is fundamentally empty, sees the marks of that object-realm and thereupon gives rise to false thought about their own-nature." The Buddha's own provisional description of earth as solid, water as moist, and so on, was never meant to assert that these qualities possess an own-nature of their own — and a śrāvaka who takes the teaching this literally has mistaken a skillful means for the very metaphysical fixation it was meant to dissolve.

Part 7 Complete

This closes Part 7: six similes for gradual and sudden purification, the doubled freedom that distinguishes the dharma-body buddha from the two vehicles' own freedom, the illusionist simile for how the imagined own-nature arises from the dependent own-nature, and the two kinds of śrāvaka a bodhisattva must learn to tell apart — one genuinely realized though still short of the Mahāyāna's full reach, the other simply mistaken about what the Buddha's own teaching ever claimed. Part 8 turns to a debate over what "eternal" and "inconceivable" can possibly mean once every other fixed position has already been dismantled — and to the five kinds of spiritual lineage, the fixed destinies by which the sūtra sorts every being, up to and including the icchantika, who cannot yet enter any of them.

Continue to Part 8 — Eternal, Inconceivable, and the Five Lineages →