Part 50 of the collection · Fascicle 4 of 4 · 楞伽阿跋多羅寶經 T0670

Closing Verse: The Final Teaching

The Buddha restates the entire teaching against eating meat one final time in verse — every argument from Part 49 gathered together, sharpened, and, near its end, invoked as a prohibition this very scripture itself imposes by name, alongside three other sūtras the tradition remembers as having taught the same thing. This is the closing passage of the Laṅkāvatāra Sūtra as Guṇabhadra transmitted it in 443 CE — the very text carried, by tradition, from Bodhidharma to Huike at the root of the Chan lineage.

Translator: Ru-Yi Meditation Center Status: Complete Source: Taishō T0670, 楞伽阿跋多羅寶經 (tr. Guṇabhadra, 443 CE) Reading notes after Zongle and Ruqi's 楞伽阿跋多羅寶經註解 (T1789)

The Chain of Consequence, Once More

Chinese Source

爾時,世尊欲重宣此義而說偈言:

「曾悉為親屬, 鄙穢不淨雜,
不淨所生長, 聞氣悉恐怖。

一切肉與葱, 及諸韮蒜等,
種種放逸酒, 修行常遠離。

亦常離麻油, 及諸穿孔床,
以彼諸細蟲, 於中極恐怖。

飲食生放逸, 放逸生諸覺,
從覺生貪欲, 是故不應食。

由食生貪欲, 貪令心迷醉,
迷醉長愛欲, 生死不解脫。

為利殺眾生, 以財網諸肉,
二俱是惡業, 死墮叫呼獄。

若無教想求, 則無三淨肉,
彼非無因有, 是故不應食。

彼諸修行者, 由是悉離遠,
十方佛世尊, 一切咸呵責。

Ru-Yi Translation

At that time, wishing to restate this meaning once more, the World-Honored One spoke in verse:

"Every creature has once been one's own kin — foul, impure, and mixed together indiscriminately; grown and nourished by what is unclean, its very scent strikes every being with terror.

Every kind of meat, and the onion, the leek, and the garlic too, and every kind of intoxicating wine that breeds heedlessness — the practitioner should forever keep far away from all of these.

One should likewise always avoid sesame oil, and any bed with holes or gaps in it, since the many small creatures within them are filled with the greatest terror there.

Eating and drinking give rise to heedlessness; heedlessness gives rise to manifold sensations; from sensation, craving desire itself arises — and it is for this very reason that one should not eat meat.

Through eating, craving desire arises; craving intoxicates and confuses the mind; intoxication and confusion prolong desire further still, and one is never liberated from birth-and-death.

Killing sentient beings for the sake of profit, using one's own wealth as a net to catch their flesh — both of these alike are evil karma, and death leads to the hell of wailing cries.

Where there is no teaching, no seeking, and no desiring it at all, there is no such thing as the 'three-fold pure meat' any longer — for it, too, does not arise without a cause, and it is for this very reason that one should not eat it.

Every practitioner should, for this very reason, keep entirely far apart from it — every buddha, the World-Honored One, throughout the ten directions, rebukes it without exception."

Reading note — after Zongle and Ruqi

The commentators identify the "three-fold pure meat" (三淨肉) named here as the very loophole this scripture has just closed in Part 49's prose teaching — meat one has not seen killed, not heard killed, and does not suspect was killed specifically for oneself, a provisional allowance found in earlier stages of the Buddha's teaching. The verse's own reasoning for closing even this narrower door is compact but exact: "若無教想求,則無三淨肉,彼非無因有" — "where there is no teaching [another to kill], no seeking it out, and no desiring it at all, there is no such thing as 'three-fold pure meat' left standing, for it, too, does not arise without a cause." Even meat that meets all three traditional conditions still required an animal's death somewhere along the chain that produced it — the "three-fold pure meat" allowance was never a claim that no killing occurred, only that the eater's own hands were once considered sufficiently distant from it, and this verse's closing lines withdraw even that distance as a meaningful shelter.

The commentators frame the entire verse's cumulative logic as a chain running from ordinary appetite to karmic consequence without a single gap: eating and drinking loosen restraint, loosened restraint breeds craving, craving intoxicates the mind, and an intoxicated mind only tightens its own bondage to birth-and-death further — so that what looks, at the start, like a minor question of diet turns out, traced through to its end, to be a direct fork in the road toward or away from liberation itself.

The Final Lines of the Laṅkāvatāra Sūtra

Chinese Source

「展轉更相食, 死墮虎狼類,
臭穢可厭惡, 所生常愚癡。

多生栴陀羅, 獵師譚婆種,
或生陀夷尼, 及諸肉食性,
羅剎猫狸等, 遍於是中生。

縛象與大雲, 央掘利魔羅,
及此楞伽經, 我悉制斷肉。

諸佛及菩薩, 聲聞所呵責,
食已無慚愧, 生生常癡冥。

先說見聞疑, 已斷一切肉,
妄想不覺知, 故生食肉處。

如彼貪欲過, 障礙聖解脫,
酒肉葱韮蒜, 悉為聖道障。

未來世眾生, 於肉愚癡說,
言此淨無罪, 佛聽我等食。

食如服藥想, 亦如食子肉,
知足生厭離, 修行行乞食。

安住慈心者, 我說常厭離,
虎狼諸惡獸, 恒可同遊止。

若食諸血肉, 眾生悉恐怖,
是故修行者, 慈心不食肉。

食肉無慈悲, 永背正解脫,
及違聖表相, 是故不應食。

得生梵志種, 及諸修行處,
智慧富貴家, 斯由不食肉。」

Ru-Yi Translation

"Devouring one another in endless succession, they fall, at death, among the ranks of tigers and wolves — foul and detestable, forever born into folly.

They are, for the most part, reborn as outcastes, as hunters, among peoples who trade in dog-flesh, or as rākṣasī demonesses and every kind of flesh-eating being — reborn, throughout, as jackals, cats, and civets.

In the Hastikakṣya, in the Mahāmegha, in the Aṅgulimālīya, and in this very Laṅkāvatāra Sūtra as well — I have, in every one of these, prohibited and entirely cut off the eating of meat.

Every buddha and bodhisattva, and every śrāvaka too, rebukes it — and one who eats it without any shame is born, life after life, forever shrouded in folly.

I have already explained how what is seen, heard, or suspected [to have been killed for oneself] cuts off every kind of meat entirely — yet, through their own false thought and lack of awareness, beings still give rise to a place where meat is eaten.

Just as the fault of craving desire itself obstructs noble liberation, so too do wine, meat, the onion, the leek, and the garlic all alike obstruct the noble path.

In future ages, sentient beings, speaking foolishly of meat, will say: 'This is pure, and carries no transgression at all — the Buddha permits us to eat it.'

One should eat as though taking medicine out of necessity, and as though eating one's very own child's flesh — knowing contentment, giving rise to weariness and renunciation, practicing instead the mendicant's way of begging for food.

One who abides in a compassionate heart, I say, is one who forever holds such things in weary renunciation — tigers, wolves, and every fierce and evil beast may then dwell alongside him without harm.

Should one eat any manner of flesh and blood, every sentient being is struck with terror at once — and it is for this very reason that the practitioner, holding to a compassionate heart, does not eat meat at all.

Eating meat is without compassion, forever turning one's back on true liberation, and running contrary to every noble outward mark — and it is for this very reason that one should not eat it.

Being born into the lineage of the wise ones, and into every place of true practice, into a family of wisdom and true prosperity — all of this comes about through not eating meat."

Reading note — after Zongle and Ruqi

The commentators identify the four scriptures named together in this verse's central lines: "陀夷尼,此云羅剎女。縛象、大雲、央掘摩羅,皆經名也" — "'dāyinī' means a rākṣasī demoness. The Hastikakṣya, the Mahāmegha, and the Aṅgulimālīya are all names of scriptures" — placing this very sūtra, the Laṅkāvatāra itself, in explicit company with three other texts the tradition remembers as having taught the same prohibition, the Buddha naming his own teaching alongside theirs as a single, consistent witness rather than an isolated position.

On the commentary's own closing words, written at the very end of their line-by-line work on this entire sūtra, Zongle and Ruqi step back from exegesis into direct exhortation: "吾佛設化,以一性平等為本,以慈悲同體為心,以為人入道為宗故,莫先於清淨離過...此經言,一切法唯自心現,苟知善惡唯心,柰何順妄想而違聖教哉!戒之,勉之" — "in establishing his teaching, our Buddha took the equality of a single nature as its foundation, compassion as one substance with all beings as its very heart, and leading people into the path as its central aim — and so nothing comes before purity and freedom from transgression... this sūtra teaches that every dharma is nothing but one's own mind's manifestation; if one truly knows that good and evil are mind alone, how could one possibly follow false thought and turn against the sacred teaching? Take heed of this, and strive earnestly." The commentators' own final words, closing eight fascicles of line-by-line exegesis on this sūtra, return to the single teaching that has run through the entire text from its opening chapter to its last line: nothing exists apart from mind, and every choice — down to what one eats — either follows that understanding or turns away from it.

The Laṅkāvatāra Sūtra: Complete

This closes Part 50, and with it the entire Laṅkāvatāra Sūtra (楞伽阿跋多羅寶經, Taishō T0670) as translated into Chinese by Guṇabhadra in 443 CE — the very recension tradition remembers as passed from Bodhidharma to Huike at the root of the Chan lineage. Fifty parts across four fascicles have carried this text from its opening scene on Mount Malaya at Laṅkā, through the five dharmas, the three own-natures, the eight consciousnesses, and the two kinds of selflessness; through the tathāgatagarbha's identity with the storehouse-consciousness and the ocean of ceaselessly arising waves; through the refutation of every outsider view of causation, permanence, and impermanence; through the bodhisattva's path across the ten grounds to buddhahood itself; and closing, at last, on the most concrete and immediate of all its teachings — how a practitioner should eat, and why. Reading notes throughout this collection have drawn on Zongle and Ruqi's Ming-dynasty commentary (楞伽阿跋多羅寶經註解, T1789), whose own closing words are quoted above as this collection's final note as well.

Return to the Laṅkāvatāra Sūtra collection index →