Aṅguttara Nikāya · Discourse 5.200

Elements of Escape

Nissāraṇīyasutta — Brāhmaṇavagga — the twentieth chapter of the Fives

Setting
None stated; the discourse continues from AN 5.1, whose setting at Sāvatthī in Jeta’s Grove is understood to hold
Speakers
The Buddha alone, addressing the mendicants
Form
five parallel structures, one per object of attachment, plus a closing conclusion
Length
~4 minutes to read
Northern parallel
not identified in this collection
Difficulty
★★★☆☆ — deeply meditative, escalating toward liberation itself

Why this discourse

This chapter's closing discourse is one of its most profound: five progressively deeper ‘elements of escape’, moving from ordinary sensuality and ill will, through form itself, to the cessation of selfhood — nibbāna, described here in strikingly experiential rather than doctrinal terms.

Reading guide

A repeated diagnostic structure

For each of five objects, the same test is applied: does the mind ‘leap forth, gain confidence, settle down, and become decided’ when focused on the object itself, or only when focused on its escape? In every case, the mind resists the object and settles only on the escape — a direct, experiential criterion for what genuinely frees the mind, not a theoretical claim.

Escape from sensual pleasures, ill will, and harming

The first three escapes are the most immediately practical: the escape from sensual pleasure is renunciation; from ill will, good will; from harming, compassion — each freeing the mind from its corresponding ‘distressing and feverish defilements’.

Escape from form, and from selfhood itself

The fourth escape moves to something more abstract: the escape from form (rūpa) is the formless (arūpa). The fifth moves further still: the escape from ‘substantial reality’ (sakkāya — personal identity, the five aggregates taken as self) is the cessation of substantial reality itself (sakkāyanirodha) — effectively nibbāna, described here as simply the fifth and final item in a progressive sequence rather than as a separate, mysterious category.

An escalating sequence, not five unrelated items

Read in order, these five escapes trace a genuine progression: from ethical concerns (sensuality, ill will, harming) through metaphysical ones (form, then selfhood) — the same structure, applied with increasing depth at each stage.

Closing the chapter

The discourse closes by naming the mendicant free of all five underlying tendencies as one who has ‘cut off craving, cast off the fetters…and made an end of suffering’ — a description of arahantship, closing both this discourse and the chapter with the tradition's own definition of complete liberation. The chapter then ends with its colophon, ‘Dasamaṁ. Brāhmaṇavaggo pañcamo’, and an uddāna verse naming this chapter's ten discourses in brief, the mechanism explained in full at AN 5.10.

Key terms

nissāraṇīyā dhātuyo — “elements of escape” — this discourse's title concept, the five progressive escapes it names.
cittaṁ pakkhandati pasīdati santiṭṭhati vimuccati — “the mind leaps forth, gains confidence, settles down, and becomes decided” — the experiential test applied to each of the five escapes.
sakkāya — “substantial reality” — personal identity, the five aggregates taken as self, the fifth and deepest object of attachment named.
sakkāyanirodha — “the cessation of substantial reality” — effectively nibbāna, named here as the fifth escape.
niranusayo — “without underlying tendencies” — the closing description of a mendicant free of all five objects of attachment.

The text

The discourse in full: five progressive escapes, from sensuality to the cessation of selfhood. Translation: Bhikkhu Sujato (CC0, SuttaCentral).

Escape from sensual pleasures, ill will, and harming

§1“Mendicants, there are these five elements of escape. What five? Take a case where a mendicant focuses on sensual pleasures, but on that their mind does not leap forth, gain confidence, settle down, and become decided. But when they focus on renunciation, on that their mind leaps forth, gains confidence, settles down, and becomes decided. Their mind is in a good state, well developed, well risen, well freed, and well detached from sensual pleasures. They’re freed from the distressing and feverish defilements that arise because of sensual pleasures, so they don’t experience that kind of feeling. This is how the escape from sensual pleasures is explained. Take another case where a mendicant focuses on ill will, but their mind does not leap forth … But when they focus on good will, their mind leaps forth … Their mind is in a good state … well detached from ill will. They’re freed from the distressing and feverish defilements that arise because of ill will, so they don’t experience that kind of feeling. This is how the escape from ill will is explained. Take another case where a mendicant focuses on harming, but their mind does not leap forth … But when they focus on compassion, their mind leaps forth … Their mind is in a good state … well detached from harming. They’re freed from the distressing and feverish defilements that arise because of harming, so they don’t experience that kind of feeling. This is how the escape from harming is explained.

Escape from form, and from selfhood itself

§2Take another case where a mendicant focuses on form, but their mind does not leap forth … But when they focus on the formless, their mind leaps forth … Their mind is in a good state … well detached from forms. They’re freed from the distressing and feverish defilements that arise because of form, so they don’t experience that kind of feeling. This is how the escape from forms is explained. Take a case where a mendicant focuses on substantial reality, but their mind does not leap forth, gain confidence, settle down, and become decided. But when they focus on the cessation of substantial reality, their mind leaps forth, gains confidence, settles down, and becomes decided. Their mind is in a good state, well developed, well risen, well freed, and well detached from substantial reality. They’re freed from the distressing and feverish defilements that arise because of substantial reality, so they don’t experience that kind of feeling. This is how the escape from substantial reality is explained.

Free from all five, an end of suffering

§3Delight in sensual pleasures, ill will, harming, form, and substantial reality don’t linger within them. That’s why they’re called a mendicant who is without underlying tendencies, who has cut off craving, cast off the fetters, and by rightly comprehending conceit has made an end of suffering. These are the five elements of escape.”

· · ·

Self-check quiz

Ten questions. Click an answer to see immediate feedback. No score is recorded — this is for your own checking.

Question 1 of 10
What experiential test does this discourse apply to each of the five objects?
Correct: A. A direct, experiential criterion, not a theoretical claim.
Question 2 of 10
What is the escape from sensual pleasures, according to this discourse?
Correct: A. The first of five progressive escapes.
Question 3 of 10
What is the escape from ill will?
Correct: A. The second escape, freeing the mind from ill will's defilements.
Question 4 of 10
What is the escape from form (rūpa)?
Correct: A. The fourth, more abstract escape in this sequence.
Question 5 of 10
What is the escape from 'sakkāya', substantial reality or personal identity?
Correct: A. Effectively nibbāna, the fifth and deepest escape.
Question 6 of 10
What progression do these five escapes trace, read in order?
Correct: A. Sensuality, ill will, and harming, then form, then selfhood.
Question 7 of 10
How does this discourse describe a mendicant free of all five underlying tendencies?
Correct: A. A description of arahantship, complete liberation.
Question 8 of 10
What colophon closes this chapter?
Correct: A. 'The tenth. The fifth chapter on brahmins.'
Question 9 of 10
What mechanism does the closing uddāna verse use?
Correct: A. The same summarizing mechanism used throughout this project.
Question 10 of 10
What chapter comes next?
Correct: A. AN 5.201 begins this collection's twenty-first chapter.
Answered 0 of 10 · Correct 0