Saṃyutta Nikāya · Discourse 35.164

With Koṭṭhita on Not-Self

Koṭṭhikaanattasutta — Nandikkhayavagga

Setting
Not restated in this discourse
Speakers
Venerable Mahākoṭṭhita, questioning the Buddha directly
Form
The identical structure as SN 35.162-163, with not-self (anattā) substituted
Length
~2 minutes to read
Northern parallel
A rough counterpart may exist in the Chinese Saṃyukta-āgama (T99), though this reading guide does not assert a specific matching sutra number
Difficulty
★☆☆☆☆ — closes the three-discourse Koṭṭhika cluster

Why this discourse

This discourse closes the three-discourse Koṭṭhika cluster, substituting “not-self” (anattā) for SN 35.163's “suffering,” completing the same three-marks sequence (impermanence, suffering, not-self) SN 22.66-68 already ran for the five aggregates in Book III — though that cluster continued to a fourth term, “not belonging to self,” at SN 22.69, where this cluster stops at three and moves to new material at SN 35.165.

Reading guide

The third and final substitution

“You should give up desire for what is not-self” closes the cluster's sequence: impermanence at SN 35.162, suffering at SN 35.163, not-self here — the traditional three marks (tilakkhaṇa), run once each across all six sense fields.

Three marks here, four terms in Book III

SN 22.66-69 ran this same substitution sequence one term further, adding “not belonging to self” (na mama) at SN 22.69 as a fourth characterization beyond the traditional three marks. This vagga's own Koṭṭhika cluster stops at three, without that fourth extension — a genuine structural difference between the two clusters, not an oversight.

Closing a cluster, not a vagga

Unlike several closing discourses already met in this book, this discourse carries no colophon of its own — it closes only the three-discourse Koṭṭhika cluster within the vagga, which itself continues for three more discourses before Nandikkhayavagga's own close at SN 35.167.

Key terms

yo anattā tatra te chando pahātabbo — “you should give up desire for what is not-self” — this discourse's own substitution, closing the three-marks sequence
anattā — not-self — the third and final characterization this cluster applies to the six sense fields
tilakkhaṇa — the three marks — impermanence, suffering, and not-self, the traditional sequence this cluster completes without SN 22.66-69's own fourth extension
na mama — “not belonging to self” — SN 22.69's own fourth term, absent from this cluster
cakkhu, rūpā, cakkhuviññāṇaṁ, cakkhusamphasso — the eye, sights, eye consciousness, and eye contact — the same fourfold expansion carried through all three discourses of this cluster

The text

The complete discourse: the Buddha's reply, run in full for the eye and compressed across the remaining five sense fields (Mahākoṭṭhita's own request is elided in the source, identical to the two discourses before this one). Translation: Bhikkhu Sujato (CC0, SuttaCentral).

§1“Koṭṭhita, you should give up desire for what is not-self. And what is not-self? The eye, sights, eye consciousness, and eye contact are not-self: you should give up desire for them. The pleasant, painful, or neutral feeling that arises dependent on eye contact is also not-self: You should give up desire for it. The ear … nose … tongue … body … The mind, ideas, mind consciousness, and mind contact … The pleasant, painful, or neutral feeling that arises dependent on mind contact is also not-self: you should give up desire for it. Koṭṭhita, you should give up desire for what is not-self.”

· · ·

Self-check quiz

5 questions. Click an answer to see immediate feedback. No score is recorded — this is for your own checking.

Question 1 of 5
What single substitution closes this discourse's own cluster?
Correct: A. Impermanence, suffering, not-self — the traditional three marks, now complete.
Question 2 of 5
How does this cluster's own scope compare to SN 22.66-69's in Book III?
Correct: A. SN 22.69 adds "na mama" as a fourth characterization this cluster does not use.
Question 3 of 5
What does this discourse's own closing carry, unlike several other closing discourses already met in this book?
Correct: A. The vagga itself continues for three more discourses after this one.
Question 4 of 5
What are the traditional three marks (tilakkhaṇa) this cluster's three discourses complete in turn?
Correct: A. SN 35.162, 163, and 164, one mark each.
Question 5 of 5
What discourse follows this one, and what new material does it introduce?
Correct: A. SN 35.165-167 form the vagga's own final cluster, on wrong view, substantialist view, and theory of self.
Answered 0 of 5 · Correct 0